The Ngrams of MRSA, staphylococcus, and Staphylococcus

So Google has released this Ngram thingee that searches for words in all of the archived Google stuff. So I decided to look for the words "MRSA", "staphylococcus", and "Staphylococcus." Here's what I found:

MRSAstaphStaph1870

You'll note that both staphylococcus and Staphylococcus surge around the same time as the influenza pandemic of 1918. What's odd though is that if we drill into the years 1910-1920, the highest use of both words is around 1913, although it doesn't decrease much until after 1920. Presumably, bloodstream infections (sepsis) from WWI, followed by the influenza pandemic--in which secondary staphylococcal and streptococcal infections played a huge role in mortality--made these widely discussed terms. What's interesting too, is that the use of staphylococcus as a general pronoun seems to have declined even as the use of Staphylococcus has increased ("staphylococci also peaked in the 60s and then decreased. Damn hippies! Or something).

Regarding MRSA, as you might expect, as evolved in the late 1960s and spread worldwide, mentions of it became more and more common. An odd thing about "MRSA" is that in the 1800s, especially the first half, MRSA was also a title in England, although I can't find out what it means (Google is completely overwhelmed by the modern MRSA, and apparently it is a title no longer in use).

More like this

In the midst of the concern about TEH SWINEY FLOO!, very few people (other than the Mad Biologist), have been discussing the double whammy of influenza followed by bacterial infections. A couple of years ago, I first started describing reports of KPCs: No, KPC isn't a new fast food restaurant. It'…
[Given our posts (here, here) on the particularly severe flu season in Australia, we thought it useful to remind ourselves that a bad flu season can be really bad -- worse than the 1918 pandemic in some locations. Here is a post we did back in April 2006 about an interesting paper (see link in post…
Frank Crary said: In an effort to clear up this statistical game, I'm posting a detailed comparison of Mr. Lambert's and my models of the crime rate in New South Wales, between 1910 and 1930. The data, taken from the graph he posted on the 15th of this month, is: [Numbers deleted] (Please correct…
We've been around on this before, and all it does is impress me with the predilection of some pro-gun folks for self-delusion on this topic. (I'm sorry if that sounds harsh, but it seems to me that many people suspend their powers of reason on this issue.) Here are the NSW homicide rates from 1910…