Cool video (via Bill Benzon over at The Valve:
A bit more below the fold, but only after you watch the video.
What a great example of change blindness, eh? I missed them all.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Recently, I picked up a copy of the latest 3x3 Annual (No. 4 to be exact), and was perusing through the great artwork that it compiles. Here the entries (about 250 pages worth) are essentially on display via a competition format, and if looking at a wonderful array of graphics is your kind of…
Last week, I proposed the writing of a piece that aimed to look at the music video for Radiohead's "Just" in a scientific way. Here, I just wanted to note that Bill Benzon over at The Valve picked up on it and generated some interesting reader feedback - feedback that was distinctly different from…
Via a mailing list, the Gingerbread Haka:
If you don't get the joke, there's a video of the original below the fold, with bonus shirtless ruggers:
There are dozens of other versions on YouTube, including one with French subtitles, if you really want to know what they're chanting. It's a pre-game…
I present for you an example of inferring a bit too much from inappropriate data. This isn't quite the same as making claims about demography based on 100 nucleotides from 6 individuals. But it's not much better given that this example is from a study of extant organisms. Abstracts to clarify what…
I'm going to turn in my Dick Tracy Crimestoppers card collection and get a tin cup and a little monkey and wear dark glasses. :(
I didn't notice any of the color changes, but I did notice the person in the gorilla suit sitting quietly on the sidelines. I wonder if I was primed to see that given that Wiseman was the one who did the basketball/gorilla thing.
I kept waiting for the gorilla to do something.
Damn - I didn't even see the gorilla!!!!
Sorry about that, it was actually Daniel Simons and Chris Chabris that did the study.
I missed all the color changes, but I did catch the gorilla in the background.
Three out of four color changes spotted. But what really kept distracting me were their odd hand motions at the end of the costume change that show up in the first video. Focus on the woman's hands and you'll see what I mean.
Ironically, I noticed the black table and curtain at the beginning of the video and thought to myself, "Hey, they always use a black table and black background in card tricks", but I failed to notice when they changed colors. Intuitively, the color change of the shirts is far more subtle.
And I wonder if that was a person in a gorilla suit or a large stuffed gorilla.
When I show my students a similar video (the gorilla one) those who notice the changes will often ask if this means they are more "aware" (or whatever) compared to other students. I usually get a good laugh when I answer: No, it actually means you don't pay enough attention to what's important!
Great stuff. There are a lot of "watch for changes" videos at the Illinois visual cognition laboratory that you can watch here, along with descriptions. I play the original gorilla basketball video for my classes sometimes, and it's shocking how many never see the gorilla. For anyone who scoffs that video isn't as easy to spot things in, there are also videos that were taken of real-life situations - in one, a person stops someone on the univ. quad and asks for directions. After they talk for a minute some guys walk between them with a sheet of drywall, and the guy switches places with another behind the drywall, and after they pass by she keeps on talking, oblivious to the fact that she's now talking to a completely different person.
To be honest, I was simply irritated by the fact that this is not authentic sleight of hand. It wouldn't work in front of a live audience--the "trick" is created using video. And no, I didn't see the gorilla, either, until the secret of the "trick" was revealed.