The collective brain

fishschool500.jpg

An individual ant is quite insignificant, but a large group of ants can do quite remarkable things. Likewise, neurons evolved to communicate with each other, and are quite useless except when connected to a network of other neurons.

I've always liked to use the ant colony as an anology for brain function. According to this article about swarm intelligence by Carl Zimmer, it may be more than just an anology:

By studying army ants -- as well as birds, fish, locusts and other swarming animals -- Dr. Couzin and his colleagues are starting to discover simple rules that allow swarms to work so well. Those rules allow thousands of relatively simple animals to form a collective brain able to make decisions and move like a single organism.

Deciphering those rules is a big challenge, however, because the behavior of swarms emerges unpredictably from the actions of thousands or millions of individuals.

This collective brain is capable of performing higher order computational processes, such that the ant colony is endowed with problem-solving and decision-making skills. This behaviour is decentralized - it is self-organizing rather than under the control of any individual within the group.

In his article, Carl discusses the work of Iain Couzin, a mathematical biologist at Princeton who builds computer models of swarms in order to better understand the collective behaviour of animals.

Such models can be applied in many practical situations. For example, Houston-based medical and industrial gas company America Air Liquide uses artificial intelligence software based on the collective behaviour of ants to determine the most efficient routes for delivering their products to 6,000 different locations.

Couzin and his colleagues are using their models to investigate decision-making in groups of people. The feedback observed between individuals in their experimental human swarms, Couzin says, resembles the decision-making mechanisms of the human brain.

Categories

More like this

Not much blogging this week--I'm heading out to California to receive the National Academies prize I wrote about a while back. In the meantime, let me direct your attention to my lead article in this week's Science Times section of the NY Times. I wrote about swarms, herds, schools, gaggles, and…
My fellow bloggingheads John Horgan and George Johnson took some time on their latest science talk to dissect my New York Times article on swarms (you can jump to that section here). John wonders if I'm just discovering all the complexity stuff he and George were writing about back in the 1990s. I…
Yup, traveling, but still manged to take a quick look at what's new in PLoS ONE today. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. You can now also easily place articles on various social services (CiteULike, Mendeley,…
John Tierney inaugurates his new Science Times column with a charming mediation on a recent neuroeconomics paper published in Neuron: The economists teamed with psychologists at Stanford to turn an M.R.I. machine into a shopping mall. They gave each experimental subject $40 in cash and offered the…

Swarm models are also being used in weapons research. (That information is from a friend in the industry - I don't have a citation.) My completely unscientific response? That is just creepy. But where the money is the science goes.

I am in absolute agreement with what you are saying in this column. But you can take your study even further, everything behaves in this manner, trees, birds, water,rocks. There really is only one mind operating these things, individually, then as a group and then collectively as a single collaboration. We as humans are just an extension of that very process and beyond us there is a bigger mind process at work which is part of a bigger process at work. As you say individually what the swarms may be doing seems chaotic, even frightening but in the end the result is achieved. As you look around at our civilization in many ways it looks chaotic and frightening but on a larger scale than we are able to perceive everything is working to perfection. It has to just by the laws of nature. And this article here illustrates this point beautifully.
Thank You,
Kevin Lawrence

By Kevin Lawrence (not verified) on 14 Nov 2007 #permalink

This makes me want to play SimAnt ^_^