Great Experiment Round-Up

It's depressingly typical of my life that we would get BoingBoing-ed on a weekend when I'm visiting the in-laws...

I've gotten a bunch of responses to my earlier request for "Great Experiments" in other areas of science, and I thought I'd collect the links in one post (many of them show up as TrackBacks to the original post, but some don't):

(If I've missed any, or other posts have been made since I last checked, let me know, and I'll update the list...)

Thanks to all the bloggers who responded. It's flattering to have such an off-hand request taken seriously. (Requests for things I ought to post are, of course, welcome in return...) There's lots of interesting material in those posts, and they'll provide plenty of reading the next time I'm looking for cat-vacuuming activities.

As for the Great Experiments in Physics post that kicked this off, I've collected a good number of comments, and plan to do some short(ish) posts explaining the most popular choices, once I'm back home with access to a browser that isn't IE, and a keyboard that doesn't suck.

Tags

More like this

Newton's Principia has won the prestigious Cosmic Variance Greatest Paper contest, with Dirac's theory of the electron coming in second. I'm still accepting nominations for the greatest physics experiment ever (probably until the weekend, when I'll have time to do something with the list...).…
SPECIAL NOTE:This page and its subordinate pages will no longer be updated. See the new page at my new blog for the live version, and change all your subscriptions. Thank you. This is a list of the Basic Concepts posts being put up by Science Bloggers and others. It will be updated and put to the…
Dave Munger is part of the numerous North Carolinian contingent here at Scienceblogs.com. He writes the Cognitive Daily blog and runs the ResearchBlogging.org blog aggregator. At the Science Blogging Conference two weeks ago, Dave led a session on Building interactivity into your blog. Welcome to…
This week, ScienceBloggers tackled the question of how much control the public ought to have over the scientific research that its tax dollars pay for. The question was phrased like so: "Since they're funded by taxpayer dollars (through the NIH, NSF, and so on), should scientists have to justify…

So it's not just me who makes that typo ["Great"] with Greta's name.

God damn it, but I hate that keyboard...
Typo fixed. My apologies.

A good general rule is that if you see something about science on Slashdot, you should trust it about as far as you can throw it.

By Aaron Bergman (not verified) on 25 Jan 2006 #permalink

I use Slashdot for two things: News aggregation and Entertainment. The /. editors and I have a congruous enough idea of what's cool and interesting that I'm fine letting them find a portion of my news, and if what they find is useless and/or misinformed, then the comments bashing the story are almost inevitably entertaining. To me, at least.