A preliminary report on the standings in the Greatest Physics Experiment voting:
- Michelson-Morley: 13
- Faraday: 7 (including one vote in the Farady post)
- Roemer: 5
- Aspect: 4.5 (one indecisive person voted for both Cavendish and Aspect)
- Galileo: 3
- Rutherford: 3
- Cavendish: 1.5
- Hertz: 1 (in the comments to the Hertz post)
Newton, Hubble, and Mössbauer are currently getting shut out.
Voting will remain open for another couple of days, so if you're a backer of somebody other than Michelson and Morley, you've still got time for a late charge: round up some friends, and get out the vote.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The votes are in, and have been carefully tabulated by our bleary-eyed accounting firm (that is, me-- I would've posted last night, but I went to see Chuck D speak (because I'm down with the old-school rap), and he went on for more than two hours...) . What looked like a runaway victory for…
The Top Eleven is now complete. Here's the full list of experiments, with links to my summaries:Galileo Galilei: ~1610: Discovery of the moons of Jupiter, and measurements of the acceleration of falling objects.Ole Roemer ~1675: Measurement of the speed of light by timing the eclipses of Io.Isaac…
Evil elves have apparently snuck into the house in the middle of the night, and stuffed my sinuses with cotton and motor oil (the dog is sitting here muttering "I told you there were evil elves out there but did you listen? 'Stop barking at nothing,' you said..." Or maybe that's the drugs.). This…
Today is the last day to vote in Cosmic Variance's Greatest Physics Paper contest. If you haven't voted yet, go over there and pick a paper.
Locally, I'm still collecting nominees for the Greatest Physics Experiment. A quick scan through the comments gives the current list as:The Michelson-Morley…
I'll put in a sympathy vote for Hubble...
I would be inclined to offer a write-in vote for Francis Crick & Rosalind Franklin, two physicists who made a small contribution to understanding the basis of inheritance in biological systems.
Unlike astrophysics, poor biophysics is rarely recognized as being True Physics. :(
I'll have to vote for Faraday. I wish I had thought of this before, but I'd be interested to know if Ph.D.s in physics voted differently than non-Ph.D.s. I would expect that folks in different fields of physics vote differently, also.
I'll have to vote for Faraday. I wish I had thought of this before, but I'd be interested to know if Ph.D.s in physics voted differently than non-Ph.D.s. I would expect that folks in different fields of physics vote differently, also.
There probably are differences there, but even if I'd asked, I don't think I'm going to get enough responses to have any statistical significance...
I vote Faraday, he united electricity and magnetism setting up the stage toward a TOE (Theory of Everything).