The Open Laboratory Needs More Physics

The indefatigable Bora Zivkovic is soliciting contributions for the science blogging anthology The Open Laboratory. He's titled the post "Last Call for Submissions," but the actual deadline is December 20th. On or about December 19th, I expect a post title along the lines of "Wolf! Wooooolllllfffff!!! Oh My God, a Wolf!" but that's neither here nor there.

Being a commmitted advocate of Open Science, Bora has posted the full list of submissions to date. Looking it over, my main reaction is "Where's the Physics?" It's not just that this blog isn't nominated, but a general lack of physics posts-- there are two from Backreaction, three from Cosmic Variance, and one from Cocktail Party Physics, but those are all way too low. And there's nothing at all from Dave Bacon or Scott Aaronson or Tomasso Dorigo, and that's just wrong.

Most of the posts on that list are self-nominated, which is why none of my stuff is there-- I always feel like the Chris Klein character in Election when it comes to voting for myself. I'll get over it and nominate a few things (the dog posts, some Basic Concepts articles), and I'll definitely nominate Scott's explanation of Shor's algorithm, which may be the best science blog post ever. But if you read physics-oriented blogs, and can remember posts that you like, go submit some nominations.

More like this

For the past two years, Scibling Bora has shepherded the creation of an anthology sampling the best of science blogging, called The Open Laboratory. Blog posts written since December 20, 2007 are eligible for consideration; you can nominate your own posts, as well as posts by other bloggers. The…
Perhaps you are familiar with the 2006 Science Blogging Anthology, The Open Laboratory, that was put together by Bora Zivkovic. It is a great collection of (most) of the best of last year's science blogging, but as Bora has recently noted to me, it is lacking something important. That is, there…
Several items showed up recently that may be of interest to science bloggers, their readers, and related science communicators of various stripes.... A) Today, Eureka, the science section of London Times, published a list of Top 30 Science Blogs. Every list that has me in it is a good list ;-)…
Over at evolgen, RPM is wondering about the disciplinary distribution of bloggers: I have an intuition, backed up by absolutely no evidence, that my particular area of interest (evolutionary genetics) has more faculty blogging about stuff related to their research than other fields. This is most…

Thank you. You are right - the list is awfully thin on physics. That needs to be fixed and I hope your readers submit a bunch of good posts from the physics blogs.

Reed also needs a physics blogger or two to help review the entries. Any UP readers/bloggers willing to do so? E-mail me....