Suck it Osama bin Laden and the Archbishop of Cantebury!

So some of the SciBlings have been playing with one of the newer "rate-your-impact" websites called QDos. (The Internet is such a narcissistic place.) Basically, through an algorithm I don't entirely understand, it calculates the impact factor of your name. You can then compare it to other names. Here is what happens when I compared it to religious leaders:

i-3bfd761ddaa9ef66fe1c295e665f76ed-impact.jpg

Sweet. I should totally start a religion or jihad or something.

More like this

... In which I narrow the gulf between two allied factions enough that with a running start you can jump across ... maybe. It has been suggested that Accommodationism is "a more moderate atheist perspective on the nature of religion and science."1 In this view, religion and science are not…
Klout is kind of evil. Basically, it's the impact factor for the Web, where this random company uses a mysterious algorithm to quantify and rank people's standing on social media -- Twitter, Facebook, etc. There's been some interesting commentary about it on teh interwebs these lasts few days,…
The whole issue of pseudonymity has come up again, both on Google+ and on ScienceBlogs. While I've been on the Internet for nigh on 20 years, my initial point of entry was through a Usenet group that strongly preferred real names (or something real-name-ish). As a result, I've never tried to…
I suppose you could, with some justification, accuse me of being a troll, given that my post "So I'm a Christian. Shoot me." generated an entirely predictable set of flames tearing me down for unscientific thinking, and for trying to claim that there is any kind of bias against the religious…

don't get ahead of yourself.

i'm willing to put money on the fact that more people are named jake young than osama bin laden.

happenstance? or britney spears?