SciencePunk Art Challenge: redesign Ben's book!

Today the Big Daddy of bad science journalism, Ben Goldacre, received the advance new-look copies of his fantastically brilliant book, Bad Science. He didn't take well to having his picture in it, either because he is so modest he gets flustered by these things, or because he is in reality several different people engaged in an elaborate ruse the meaning of which we cannot fathom.

Anyway, all his harping inspired me demonstrate just how bad the Bad Science cover redesign could have been. His publishers may, for example, have tried to boost female readership by breaking into the misery-lit market:

i-2482affde5f50a907f11748838ed392c-BS_misery.png

But then, how good could it have gone? I mean, what if Ben's book had come out in the 1960s?

i-d64d3e5530c99aa244673b5a1b86653d-BS_classic.png

What do you think? Could you design a better / worse cover? Special points for using Ben's face on the front or making him appear to be berserk with rage. Only real quotes from or about the book allowed. Winner gets a free copy of the Bad Science book. Email your efforts, no matter how crude, to webmaster@sciencepunk.com. Submissions below the fold...

Submitted:

Bad Science for kids by Bob Furness

i-e6adec6f157037e8056f44932d801059-bad_science_for_kids.png

Bad Science neon edition by Daniel Robertson

i-8f23c6b87120bdeba10426ad3b6c7667-bgbs.jpg

Bible-tastic Weighty Tome edition by Dan Johnson

i-1b60b97b949609a7576047aea5145f24-bs_weighty_tome.jpg

More like this

Journalist, doctor, and debunker Ben Goldacre has released the infamous missing chapter from his best-selling book Bad Science. This did not appear in the original edition because it covered the malfeasance of Matthias Rath, who was suing Goldacre for libel at the time. Rath lost his case and…
Richard Wiseman, the fabulously funny and enlightening skeptical psychologist, has written a book called Paranormality which is a fabulously funny and enlightening dissection of paranormal claims; I got an advance copy because I'm special and I recommend it highly, and so do Skepchicks. However,…
Tom Levenson has another post up in his ongoing series about the writing and publishing process of his new book, this one about generating publicity. At this point, he's gone past what I've experienced so far, but this is fortuitously timed, as I got a note from my editor yesterday saying that the…
I've gotten a fair number of free science books in the last few years, from publishers looking for bloggy publicity, but Mark Alpert's Final Theory is the first time that I've been asked to review a novel on ScienceBlogs (I've gotten advance copies of some other novels, but I've specifically…

My only regret is not making it even uglier :). Lets see some more submissions!

Not really sure where I was going with my one, the neon / Einstein / duck's legs / bubbles type thing... But I'm with you Bob, we need to see some more submissions!

How about "Bad Science" from the past?If this doesn't work, I'll simply e-mail it to you.