Arlen Specter Leaves GOP for Dems

The Republican party today moved another step closer to becoming just the regional party of the South by losing one of its most respected members, Senator Arlen Specter (PA). Citing the Republicans' notable swing to the right in recent years, Specter announced earlier that he would be switching parties to join the Democrats. His switch will give the Democrats a filibuster-proof 60-vote supermajority in the Senate, assuming the courts uphold Al Franken's victory in the Minnesota Senate race.

Without a doubt, this is a positive development. Fears that the Democrats will have "too much power" are overblown, as Specter will certainly continue to be an independent voice in the Democratic Party as he was in the Republican Party. More importantly, since Obama's inauguration, the GOP has done little else besides engage in obstructionist tactics, while offering few if any solutions of their own. This move, then, should at the very least help make Congress more productive.

You can read Specter's full remarks here, but here's a taste:

Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right. Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats. I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans.,p>

When I supported the stimulus package, I knew that it would not be popular with the Republican Party. But, I saw the stimulus as necessary to lessen the risk of a far more serious recession than we are now experiencing.

Since then, I have traveled the State, talked to Republican leaders and office-holders and my supporters and I have carefully examined public opinion. It has become clear to me that the stimulus vote caused a schism which makes our differences irreconcilable. On this state of the record, I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate. I have not represented the Republican Party. I have represented the people of Pennsylvania.

More like this

I thought Rachel Maddow had a very smart take on the fallout from the Massachusetts Senate race. I've placed a lengthy excerpt below the fold. On paper, after Al Franken was finally certified as winning in Minnesota, Democrats had a filibuster-proof, 60-seat majority. On paper, that's what they…
Kansas is a divided state, at war between red and blue and purple. Even setting aside the battle between K-State and KU, there's a war between conservatives, Democrats, and moderate voters who used to think of themselves as moderates. While the New York Times can only find time to mention that 6…
In an act of political expediency, Arlen Specter has switched parties. This is good, in that it gives the Democrats more clout (especially when Minnesota's senator is finally seated). It's bad in that we don't want ex-Republicans to have more voice in the party. We'll take it, anyway. The best part…
Ending obstructions thrown up by wingnuts who think that abortion is more important than a global pandemic, the U.S. Senate confirmed Kathleen Sebelius as Secretary of Health and Human Services. Sebelius has resigned as Governor of Kansas and is moving into her office. Lieutenant Governor Mark…

Republicans have managed to PUSH the Senator to the other sides. If they don't watch it, they'll push Maine's two Senators over, too. OsiSpeaks.com

If it won't be an amicable split, at least it will be dignified. On Specter's part, if not the GOP's.

Fears that the Democrats will have "too much power" are overblown

Personally, I don't think fears that any politicians have too much power are ever overblown. Consider how much effort goes into fighting things as obscure as the Texas Board of Education. I think you'd agree with me that a certain fundamentalist dentist from Bryan has too much power.

However, I assume you are referring to the marginal difference from Spector's switch, in which case I mostly agree.

There needs to be an opposition party. But it doesn't need to be a wingnut party. Perhaps everyone should leave the GOP except the religious right, making the Democratic Party so big that it splits in two. We can have a 30% left Democratic Party, a 30% conservative Democratic Party (Blue Dog Party?), and a 20% wingnut GOP. Which eventually withers away.

However, I assume you are referring to the marginal difference from Specter's switch, in which case I mostly agree.

Yes, that's right. And, I agree with your premise that we have to constantly hold our leaders accountable and not let anyone consolidate too much power. However, I'm not too worried about the Democrats in general right, now given how effectively internal disagreements and fault lines seem to mitigate their power.