HIV vs. Phylogenetics

For the past week and change, ScienceBlogs has been nerdily (and happily) hosting the Science Spring Showdown. It is Signout's distinct honor to host the Sweet Sixteen match-up between HIV and Phylogenetics. (Please see the SSS Press Center for details of previous rounds' results.)

i-4456a7816e937e661e478a01300e7e5c-bracket16small.jpg

As a microorganism, HIV is dazzlingly cunning and elusive; as an epidemic, it is insatiable; and as a PR campaign, it is straight-up sexy. In the past, if you wanted to talk about condoms, prostitution, anal sex, and men who have sex with men, you'd have to go to a shady bar, or maybe a Democratic convention. Now, because of HIV, these subjects are all easily within the domain of legitimate scientists all over the world. And what other sexually transmitted disease has such glamorous benefit events? Or BONO?

Phylogenetics has the advantage of being, quite literally, above it all. It has tremendous appeal in its embrace of rigor and method, and although it does not employ celebrities in promoting its cause, it provides a lens through which no one (and no thing) can avoid being seen. Yes, phylogenetics lacks the drama of being a disease without a cure. But it holds within its confines innumerable unanswered questions, and at least as many opportunities for mental gymnastics as HIV does.

Organism vs. system!

Chaos vs. method!

Octopussy vs. Bond!

Acronym vs. multisyllabic word!

Mac vs. PC!

HIV vs. Phylogenetics!

Who will win?



Addendum (3/30/07):

Evolgen points the less familiar cheering squads to several articles in Nature (#1 and #2) and in his own oeuvre that highlight previous encounters between these teams.

On a related note, a NY Times article from this week's Science section points to a Nature article detailing the delayed speciation of mammals following the extinction of non-avian dinosaurs. Natch, evolgen has something to say about this, too. Rahhhh, phylogenetics! Or whatever.

Tags

More like this

This one was immense. It was also a dual effort (and not by "one of the guys" at the blog). Like the Puzzle Fantastica, this one is very difficult to re-post in its entirety. Luckily, Dave made a great graphic with links embedded to each game. I'll reprint the Press Center, then, which includes…
CLICKABLE MAP OF TOURNAMENT HERE OR CLICK ON THE IMAGE BELOW Printable brackets available here (pdf) (THIS PAGE WILL HAVE UP TO DATE COVERAGE - LAST EDIT, APRIL 30th) - - - (March 12th) Grand opening. Introductory remarks. Brackets revealed. (link at World's Fair) (March 14th) Arenas will open…
PRESS CENTER | PRINTABLE BRACKETS Well, you know it's big when the American Idol gang weigh in with an opening musical number (live at the HIV vs Plasmodium court, and telecast to the others). Not only that, but the crazy reworking of Kelly Clarkson's "Since you've been gone" using the words from…
1st ROUND RESULTS | PRESS CENTER | PRINTABLE BRACKETS After the excitement of the first round action in the Octopus region, we can only hope that the second round is half as dynamic. The big upset last round saw Unipotent knocking off Totipotent. There has also been an interesting twist, as…

Um, maybe it's just my current mental-status-changing fever from some bug I've caught from all the ER patients coughing on me...but I'm confused. Am I the only one that's confused? And I'm all for celebrating our geekness, but is this taking geek too far? Just a thought.

What? You haven't been following this? And you call yourself a MAN?

loooooseeerrr.

I read your first little post about this. I thought it was a joke. Going back I've surmised that, yes, it's just geeky. And the fact that I got the Duesberg reference in the synopsis of HIV's first round against plasmodium makes me all that much of a geek...and yes, I agree...a loser. But who's been going around calling me a man damn it?

By Anonymous (not verified) on 29 Mar 2007 #permalink

Is this taking the geek too far?

I can't think of a better metaphysical question. Can you take it too far? Maybe. (Plus my money is on H.I.V.)

This could come down to the rapid evolution of the HIV genome vs. the ability of phylogenetic methods to reconstruct evolutionary relationships.

Or maybe HIV will turn to its biology (how boring!) rather than its evolutionary genetics. By taking the game outside of phylogenetics domain, HIV could end up scoring at will.

I think people differ greatly on this issue. For example, if it were completely unidentifiable as my own, I would have no problem with a picture of my naked ass being posted on the Internet. Others would be absolutely horrified by the prospect.