Ask Ethan #79: The tiniest Neutron Star (Synopsis)

“Try to imagine what it will be like to go to sleep and never wake up… now try to imagine what it was like to wake up having never gone to sleep.” -Alan Watts

Neutron star matter is the stuff of legends: it's the densest three-dimensional material to exist in our Universe. With a density some 10^22 times that of water, you might think that a tiny chunk of it would be incredible to possess.

Image credit: The Mighty Thor / Marvel Comics. Image credit: The Mighty Thor / Marvel Comics.

But would such a chunk be stable, or would something catastrophic happen if you took a dense group of neutrons out of a neutron star? And if a small amount wouldn't work, what would happen? And moreover, how large of a piece would you have to break off to keep your neutron-star-chunk stable?

Image credit: ESO/L. Calçada. Image credit: ESO/L. Calçada.

The answers will surprise you, but you can find out on this week's Ask Ethan!

More like this

"We have chased away the clouds, the sky is all 'rose.'" -Francois Hollande When you have a light curve with two different large, periodic dips in it, a binary star system is the likeliest explanation. The stars eclipse, and in the case where they're so close their envelopes touch, they're known as…
"Trying to understand the way nature works involves a most terrible test of human reasoning ability. It involves subtle trickery, beautiful tightropes of logic on which one has to walk in order not to make a mistake in predicting what will happen." -Richard Feynman If you were to send a space probe…
"This event marks the culmination of many years of hard work on behalf of all involved." -Jane Bachynski If you want to take an ideal image of the Universe, you need to not only minimize your light pollution, cloud cover and build the largest-aperture telescope you can, you also need to take away…
"This isn't my life anymore, Mulder. I'm done chasing monsters in the dark." -Dana Scully, X-files One of the most exciting things a scientist can experience is when they look at a sample of data, expecting to not see a particular exciting effect, and yet, something’s there. Immediately, you have…

Two questions.
Here
"...the densest physical, three-dimensional object known"
Is the bit about three dimensional required?

Second: later, talking about the size of the sample needed to be stable you say something is a lower bound but anything larger would cause the neutrons to decay. What bit am I missing?

I suspect the smallest bit thats stable, is probably more like the Chandrashekar mass. That 200M Saturn mass piece wouldn't be in hydrostatic equilibrium, so presumably it would start expanding to a larger radius. Would a one solar mass neutron star (assume for the moment you could create one), be able to remain as essentially a NS, or would it expand until it was n
"normal" baryonic matter (white dwarf stuff)?

Also, some theories had a postulated intermediate form between a NS and a black-hole, a "quark star". The total minding energy of a Q-star (if they even exist), is several times greater than of the same mass NS (just over the max mass where a NS is stable?), so that contraction a Q-nova could release several fold more energy than an ordinary mass collapse supernova. But, maybe the thinking in the astrophysical community has changed since I read this?

By Omega Centauri (not verified) on 15 Mar 2015 #permalink

I've occasionally (more for fun than seriousness) claimed that neutron stars are the largest "elements" in the universe. There's going to be some infall of hydrogen onto their surface, which is going to be based on the density of surrounding matter and size/gravity of the neutron star. There's also going to be a very fast but non-instant conversion rate, based on the gravitational force at the surface. So they may have a non-zero number of protons (depending on the interaction between infall rate and conversion rate), and therefore a "Z." It should be possible to take this information and calculate out exactly what the Z of a given neutron star is, and therefore, what the heaviest element in the universe really is. That could be a fun math problem for an enterprising grad student; I bet it might even be publishable as a minor note or letter in a journal (again, more for amusement value than any sort of deep insight or discovery).

This is something that I have been wondering for a while now, so many thanks for this article.

Would a neutron star be neutrons all the way to the surface?

My understanding was that there would be a very thin crust of proton-electron-neutron matter at the surface, before there was sufficient pressure to sustain the neutron matter, rather like a more extreme version of the atmosphere of non-degenerate matter surrounding a white dwarf. Is that not so?

By Robert H. Olley (not verified) on 17 Mar 2015 #permalink

In the sudden absence of intense gravitational binding, would the degeneracy pressure blow apart all those particles in a catastrophic explosion (in addition to the nuclear decay)? If so, is the energy stored in that degeneracy pressure comparable at all to the nuclear energy?

By alan doak (not verified) on 18 Mar 2015 #permalink