“Exploration is in our nature. We began as wanderers, and we are wanderers still. We have lingered long enough on the shores of the cosmic ocean. We are ready at last to set sail for the stars.” -Carl Sagan
Glittering above high overhead, the canopy of night offers thousands of points of light, each one a blazing Sun, starring in the story of its own Solar System. But even armed with that knowledge, it's difficult to calculate exactly how far away such a star would actually be. The brightness/distance relationship is a great start, but stars intrinsically come in different brightnesses, making that method unreliable.
![The concept of stellar parallax, where an observer at two different vantage points sees a foreground object shift. Image credit: public domain work from Srain at English Wikipedia.](/files/startswithabang/files/2016/05/Stellarparallax_parsec1.svg_-600x941.png)
Measuring stellar parallax is a phenomenal achievement, where only the geometry of the Earth's orbit around the Sun and the proximity of the nearby star relative to the more distant one is necessary. Yet even that method comes rife with inherent uncertainties; uncertainties which may propagate all the way down the cosmic distance ladder.
![An illustration of the cosmic distance ladder, starting with individual Cepheid variable stars. Image credit: NASA, ESA, and A. Feild (STScI).](/files/startswithabang/files/2016/05/344562main_hubbleconstant_20090507_full-600x300.jpg)
Go get the whole story on what we know -- and don't yet know -- over on Forbes!
- Log in to post comments
Ethan refered to Cepheid variable stars, but didn't include any details. Here is the link to his SWAB page about them before:
http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2013/12/20/ask-ethan-16-what-ar…