New supernova results: is the Universe not accelerating? (Synopsis)

"Even if I stumble on to the absolute truth of any aspect of the universe, I will not realise my luck and instead will spend my life trying to find flaws in this understanding - such is the role of a scientist." -Brian Schmidt

Just a few days ago, a new paper was published in the journal Scientific Reports claiming that the evidence for acceleration from Type Ia supernovae was much flimsier than anyone gave it credit for. Rather than living up to the 5-sigma standard for scientific discovery, the authors claimed that there was only marginal, 3-sigma evidence for any sort of acceleration, despite having statistics that were ten times better than the original 1998 announcement.

Measuring back in time and distance (to the left of "today") can inform how the Universe will evolve and accelerate/decelerate far into the future. Image credit: Saul Perlmutter of Berkeley, via http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2009/10/27/evolving-dark-energy/. Measuring back in time and distance (to the left of "today") can inform how the Universe will evolve and accelerate/decelerate far into the future. Image credit: Saul Perlmutter of Berkeley, via http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2009/10/27/evolving-dark-energy/.

They claimed that an improved likelihood analysis combined with a rejection of all other priors explains why they obtained this result, and use it to cast doubt on not only the concordance model of cosmology, but on the awarding of the 2011 Nobel Prize for dark energy. Despite the sensational coverage this has gotten in the press, the team does quite a few things that are a tremendous disservice to the good science that has been done, and even a simplistic analysis clearly debunks their contentions.

The figure representing the confidence in accelerated expansion and in the measurement of dark energy (y-axis) and matter (x-axis) from supernovae alone. Image credit: Nielsen, Guffanti and Sarkar, 2016, from the preprint at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.01354v3.pdf. The figure representing the confidence in accelerated expansion and in the measurement of dark energy (y-axis) and matter (x-axis) from supernovae alone. Image credit: Nielsen, Guffanti and Sarkar, 2016, from the preprint at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.01354v3.pdf.

Dark energy and acceleration are real and here to stay. You owe it to yourself to find out why and how!

More like this

“Weightlessness was unbelievable. It's physical euphoria: Nothing about you has any weight. You don't realize that you are weighed down all the time by yourself, and your organs, and your head. Your arms weigh down your shoulders. In space simulation, you get to fly like Superman! You're hanging in…
"Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everybody gets busy on the proof." -J. K. Galbraith Last month, tensions between dark matter simulations and galactic rotation observations reached a new high. Despite all the successes of dark…
"Nothing in the standard cosmological model predicts this, and it is almost impossible to imagine how that model could be modified to explain it, without discarding the dark matter hypothesis completely." -David Merritt Dark matter is a hugely successful theory for explaining a whole slew of…
"Losing an illusion makes you wiser than finding a truth." -Ludwig Borne Every so often, an idea comes up in physics claiming that perhaps dark energy isn't real. The ideas focus on one of two lines of thought: either they discount the observational evidence, or they attempt to show that all the…

Silly Bunny momentarily forgot Betteridge's law of headlines.

By Naked Bunny wi… (not verified) on 27 Oct 2016 #permalink

i like this quote from wiki: "... To a busy journalist hunting for real information a question mark means 'don't bother reading this bit' " :D

By Sinisa Lazarek (not verified) on 28 Oct 2016 #permalink

A possible explanation for dark energy is the multi-universe theory. Dark energy would be the gravitational pull of other universes surrounding our universe.
if this were the case, one would expect that the pull is uneven, due to the varying distances of other universes from ours, in varying directions. Thus, the strength of dark energy on our universe would not be uniform..

By t marvell (not verified) on 07 Dec 2016 #permalink