"As an analogy one can imagine an intelligent amoeba with a good memory. As time progresses the amoeba is constantly splitting, each time the resulting amoebas having the same memories as the parent. Our amoeba hence does not have a life line, but a life tree." -Hugh Everett
We only have the one Universe, despite all the quantum possibilities out there. We have to accept that, at a fundamental level, the Universe is indeterminate, and that the act of measuring -- or otherwise making a quantum decision -- selects which quantum path our Universe takes. But according to the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, every quantum possibility that can happen does happen, just somewhere else. The key necessity for this interpretation is a large enough, perhaps even infinite number, of parallel Universes.
The multiverse idea states that there are infinite numbers of Universes like our own, and infinite ones with differences. Image credit: Lee Davy of flickr.
This might seem absurd, given the sheer number of interactions and particles present in our Universe over its 13.8 billion year history. But as large as that number is, it’s still finite. And perhaps the Universe is infinite. Or perhaps it’s finite, but it’s been around for an infinite amount of time. Or perhaps it’s finite in both space and time, but old and large enough that parallel Universe are still real... for now.
Even though inflation may end in more than 50% of any of the regions at any given time (denoted by red X’s), enough regions continue to expand forever that inflation continues for an eternity, with no two Universes ever colliding. Image credit: E. Siegel.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
It is noteworthy that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics, one example being the singularity of a black hole, while in others, it is presented as a solution to problems in Physics, as in some versions of the multiverse.
No, it's not considered a problem, teabag, when it comes to a black hole, since there's a difference you cannot comprehend between a singularity and infinity.
They aren't the same thing.
But you wouldn't know about that, you're just posting vapid nonsense to pretend that you're somehow sciency. It's your second defence mechanism against reality, the first being insane giggling and typing it out.
"No, it’s not considered a problem ..."
"Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You're wrong again.
"“No, it’s not considered a problem …”
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities..."
And infinities are not the same as infinities, retard.
Again, you are wrong. But so VERY convinced you've got a point.
Pity it's out of your intellectual reach.
"“No, it’s not considered a problem …”
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities..."
And infinities are not the same as singularities, retard.
Again, you are wrong. But so VERY convinced you've got a point.
Pity it's out of your intellectual reach.
The slip was due to you blabbing on about infinities first then quoting about SINGULARITIES second.
"... convinced you’ve got a point."
Not only do I have a point, but I can also support it with independent reference.
Which is much more than you can do.
Because you're wrong.
Again.
"Not only do I have a point"
No, sorry, you are yet once more completely mistaken.
"but I can also support it with independent reference."
Well go ahead then, teabaggie. I'm all ears, as they say!
Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re wrong again
"You’re wrong again"
Again you are mistaken, teabaggie.
Still unable to accept that you were wrong when you messed up infinities as being the same thing as singularities.
So sad.
But so predictably done as a spectacular fail on your part.
You remain mistaken.
Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"You remain mistaken."
That is where you're projecting again, tebaggie.
And still you're just agreeing that you were wrong about infinities. But still desperately insisting that this is somehow proof you were right.
Because, as we've all seen splendidly in just about every post you have ever made, you're batshit crazy!
"That is where you’re projecting ..."
Wrong again. Independent references are not projections.
"Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"Independent references are not projections."
Indeed they aren't. However, that wasn't what I said you were wrong about, teabaggie. Funny how you make such asinine claims without evidence and then demand I give evidence that you made those claims!
But insanity is ramping up over there isn't it. World isn't working the way you like it for you, is it.
Sad.
“Indeed they aren’t. …”
And the corroboration it provides for my position shows that you are wrong again.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"And the corroboration it provides for my position "
It doesn't. Your position was, and I quote:
And you bring up external corroboration you were, yet again, wrong. But in tour insanity, you promote this as somehow vindication?
Industrial grade insanity there, teabaggie! You'll make any old shit up, won't you!
You are mistaken.
You challenged the noteworthy contrasts that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics, one example being the singularity of a black hole, while in others, it is presented as a solution to problems in Physics, as in some versions of the multiverse.
@ #2 "No, it’s not considered a problem,..."
The independent corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You're wrong again.
This arguing and name calling is very immature. John taunts, Wow spews a venom and profanity-laden tantrum.
There are no winners here, boys.
Carl, John started on another of Ethan's articles posting a host of foolish items that he tried to make sound like science (but which weren't), didn't like being called on it, and things have spiraled ever since. I agree with your summary.
Carl,
If the author of the profanity-laden tantrum ceases to attack, I'll not need to respond.
"You are mistaken."
Oh, dear, another fact free content lite lie from you, teabaggie? Bad show.
"@ #2 “No, it’s not considered a problem,…”
The independent corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics."
Except it doesn't, teabags. It shows you were wrong.
Oh, this reading thing isn't your strong point, is it, teabaggie?
"John taunts, Wow spews a venom and profanity-laden tantrum."
Interesting alternative reality you live in, cal.
"and the war drags on" Donovan Leitch, 1965 ....
"... The independent corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.”
Except it doesn’t, ..."
The independent corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re wrong again.
"The independent corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics."
Except it doesn't, teabaggie.
"... Except it doesn’t, …”
The independent corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re wrong again.
"“… Except it doesn’t, …”
The independent corroboration q"
Still doesn't.
“… Still doesn’t.”
The independent corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re wrong again
"“… Still doesn’t.”
The independent corroboration "
Still doesnt.
“… Still doesn’t.”
The independent corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… Still doesn’t.”
The independent corroboration quoted "
Still doesn't.
"Still doesn’t.”
The independent corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"The independent corroboration "
Still doesn't.
“... Still doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"The corroboration quoted below "
Still doesn't.
“… Still doesn’t.”
The quote below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"The quote below "
Still doesn't.
“Still doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below supports the position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“Still doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still doesn't.
"below ”
“Still doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“below ”
“Still doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below"
Still doesn't.
“below ”
“Still doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"The corroboration quoted below "
Still fails to.
“Still fails to.”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"The corroboration quoted below supports "
You being wrong, teabaggie.
“… You being wrong ...”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… You being wrong …”
The corroboration quoted"
Still proves you wrong, teabaggie.
“… Still proves you wrong .....”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… Still proves you wrong …..”
The corroboration quoted below"
Proves you wrong, tebaggie.
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"The corroboration quoted below "
Is still proving you wrong, teabag.
"Is still proving ..."
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“Is still proving …”
The corroboration quoted "
Is still proving you wrong, teabaggie.
"... you wrong ..."
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… you wrong …”
The corroboration quoted below supports"
You being wrong, teabaggie.
"You being ..."
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“You being …”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position "
Being wrong, teabaggie.
"Being wrong ..."
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“Being wrong …”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position"
Being false, tebaggie.
"Being false ..."
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“Being false …”
The corroboration quoted below"
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
“… Still doesn’t ...”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… Still doesn’t …”
The corroboration quoted "
Still fails to.
“… Still fails to …”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
'course yo ustill have no evidence of even a singularity in a black hole, do you, teabaggie.
So it's no wonder your posts are still failing to support your wild and asinine claims. As if you made any other type of claims...!
"“… Still fails to …”
The corroboration quoted below supports "
Still proves you wrong, teabaggie.
"... a singularity in a black hole ,,,
"A gravitational singularity as predicted by general relativity is at the center of a black hole: any star collapsing beyond a certain point (the Schwarzschild radius) would form a black hole, inside which a singularity (covered by an event horizon) would be formed."
Wrong again.
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"Wrong again."
Yes, you're wrong again. You still no evidence that there's a singularity, but that doesn't stop you proclaiming it is there, teabaggie.
You love the unevidenced claim when you do it, but can't understand evidence when it's against you.
So sad.
“A gravitational singularity as predicted by general relativity is at the center of a black hole: any star collapsing beyond a certain point (the Schwarzschild radius) would form a black hole, inside which a singularity (covered by an event horizon) would be formed.”
Wrong again.
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"Wrong again."
Yes, indeed you are, teabaggie.
I knew you had no evidence.
"... you had no evidence"
I have provided the corroboration below to support my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"The corroboration quoted below supports my position "
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
"“… you had no evidence”
I have provided the corroboration below "
Instead of evidence, tebaggie.
“… doesn’t ..”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"I have provided the corroboration below to support my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics."
And still doesn't, teabaggie.
" March 14, 2017
“… doesn’t ..”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
“… And still doesn’t ...”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… And still doesn’t …”
The corroboration quoted below "
Shows you are wrong, teabaggie.
“… Shows you are wrongt …”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… Shows you are wrongt …”
The corroboration quoted below "
Shows you are wrong, teabaggie.
“… Shows you are wrong …”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
" March 14, 2017
“… Shows you are wrong …”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still shows you are wrong, teabaggie.
“… Still shows you …”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
""… Still shows you …”
The corroboration quoted below"
Shows you are wrong, teabaggie.
“… Shows you …”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… Shows you …”
The corroboration quoted below "
Is proving you wrong, teabaggie.
“… Is proving …”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… Is proving …”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
“… Still doesn’t, …”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… Still doesn’t, …”
The corroboration quoted below "
Doesn't, teabaggie.
“… Doesn’t, …”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… Doesn’t, …”
The corroboration quoted below "
Doesn't, teabaggie.
“Doesn’t...”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“Doesn’t…”
The corroboration quoted below "
Does not. But don't stop, teabaggie. Your irrelevance is amusing.
“… Does not ...”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… Does not …”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still doesn't teabaggie.
" ...below ”
Still doesn’t ..."
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"” …below ”
Still doesn’t …”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still does not, teabaggie.
"Still does not ..."
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“Still does not …”
The corroboration quoted "
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
“ quoted ”
… Still doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“ quoted ”
… Still doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
“... quoted below ”
Stilll doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
Woah, just checked in after 100+ comments like this.
You two seem to have become a time crystal.
Ethan,
If he stops attacking me, I'll feel no need to reply.
John
There are two places for this behaviour, neither of which are desired here - kindergarten, or politics.
:)
I say, the use of my name in such an insulting manner is quite preposterous. Frankly I don't know what this "Wow" person is so on about. There is nothing wrong with a lovely cup of tea.
"If he stops attacking me"
I'm not, tabaggie. Telling you you are wrong is not attacking you.
Sorry, precious, your ego is not the meaning of the world.
"There is nothing wrong with a lovely cup of tea."
Yeah, but you're always drunk.
"“… quoted below ”
Stilll doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still doesn't.
“… corroboration quoted below ”
Stilll doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… corroboration quoted below ”
Stilll doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below"
Still doesn't.
“… The corroboration quoted below ”
Stilll doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… The corroboration quoted below ”
Stilll doesn’t.”
The corroboration quoted below supports"
You being wrong, teabaggie.
“… You being wrong.”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"… You being wrong.”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
“… You being wrong.”
The corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… You being wrong.”
The corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted "
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
March 15, 2017
“… The corroboration quoted ”
Still doesn’t, ....”
The corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"---
“… The corroboration quoted ”
Still doesn’t, ….”
The corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted below"
Still doesn't, tebaggie.
“… The corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted below”
Still doesn’, ….”
The corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… The corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted below”
Still doesn’, ….”
The corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
“… corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted below”
Still doesn’, ….”
The corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"The corroboration quoted below supports my position "
Does not, teabaggie.
“The corroboration quoted below supports my position”
Does not, ….”
The corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"upports my position”
Does not, ….”
The corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted below"
Still does not, tebaggie.
“The corroboration quoted below ”
The corroboration quoted below”
Still does not, ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"
Still does not, ”
The corroboration quoted b"
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
”
The corroboration quoted below”
Still does not, ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"The corroboration quoted below”
Still does not, ”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
“The corroboration quoted below”
Still does not, ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
“The corroboration quoted below”
Still does not, ”
"
The corroboration quoted below""
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
“The corroboration quoted below”
Still doesn’t, ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
/"“The corroboration quoted below”
Still doesn’t, ”
The corroboration quoted below s"
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
“Still doesn’t, ”
The corroboration quoted below s”
Still doesn’t ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"
The corroboration quoted below s”
Still doesn’t ”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still doesn't, tebaggie.
“... doesn’t, ”
The corroboration quoted below s”
Still doesn’t ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“… doesn’t, ”
The corroboration quoted below s”
Still doesn’t ”
The corroboration quoted below"
Still doesn't., teabaggie.
“… ”
The corroboration quoted below s”
Still doesn’t ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"
“… ”
The corroboration quoted below s”
Still doesn’t ”
The corroboration quoted below"
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
“…
The corroboration quoted below ”
Still doesn’t ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"
“…
The corroboration quoted below ”
Still doesn’t ”
The corroboration quoted below "
Still doesn't.
“…
corroboration quoted below ”
Still doesn’t ”
The corroboration quoted below supports my position that in .that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still wrong.
"“…
corroboration quoted below ”
Still doesn’t ”
The corroboration quoted "
Still does not, teabaggie.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You’re still mistaken.
2You’re still mistaken."
I've been 100% on the money so far, teabaggie. All you've done is prove yourself wrong by independent external links to the WP site.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You remain mistaken.
"You remain mistaken."
I remain proven correct, teabaggie.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You've made another mistake.
"You’ve made another mistake."
I've not made one, yet, teabaggie. Can't make another one if I've not made a first one.
You’ve made another mistake.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
The following independent quote proves you're wrong, teabaggie:
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
That is another mistake.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"That is another mistake."
Why then do you keep making that mistake time and time again, teabaggie?
All you're doing is proving you are wrong.
That is yet another mistake.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"That is yet another mistake."
Then stop making it.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
So proving you are wrong, teabaggie.
I'm pleased to see you have agreed with me that you are mistaken by adopting my reference.
Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"I’m pleased to see you have "
Proved you were wrong with the external evidence:
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Well done for admitting that this proves you were wrong all along, teabaggie.
WELL DONE!
It's good to see you have agreed with me that you are mistaken by adopting my reference.
Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
It still doesn't seem to register with your incompetence that this quote proves you were and are still 100% wrong, teabaggie:
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
I'm encouraged to see by adopting my reference that you have agreed with me that you were mistaken.
Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"I’m encouraged to see by adopting my reference "
The one that proves you were wrong. You're welcome, teabaggie. Every time you want to be told when you're wrong, ask me.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Proves you are wrong, teabaggie.
It took a surprisingly long time, but by adopting my reference you have agreed with me that you were mistaken.
Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"It took a surprisingly long time,"
Nut you've finally realised that the quote proved you wrong?
Nah, you're far too nutjob for that, aren't you teabaggie.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Proves you are wrong, teabaggie.
By adopting my reference you have agreed with me that you were mistaken.
Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"By adopting my reference"
Its not your reference, teabaggie. It's a WP link.
"you have agreed with me that you were mistaken."
That's your mistake, teabaggie.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Proves you are wrong, teabaggie.
You could have saved yourself much trouble by agreeing with me sooner that you were mistaken.
Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"You could have saved yourself much trouble by agreeing with me "
But that would mean telling you a lie, teabaggie.
I realise that you spam and spam and spam and spam and spam and spam and spam and spam and spam so as to make everyone just give up and agree with whatever insanity you are currently spouting, but it's rather brazen to just come out and say so.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Proves you are wrong, teabaggie.
By adopting the reference that supports my position, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken.
Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"the reference that supports my position"
Still doesn't, teabaggie.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Proves you are wrong, teabaggie.
By adopting the reference that supports my position, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken. This shows you in a good light, what with being able to recognize your error, and are willing to make the needed adjustments.
Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"the reference that supports my position"
Still doesn't teabaggie. It still proves you wrong.
Adopting the reference that supports my position as you have, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken. It’s good to see you being able to recognize your error, and are willing to make the needed adjustments.
Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
" the reference that supports my position "
Doesn't exist, teabaggie.
Because you're wrong. This one:
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Proves you were and still are wrong.
Adopting the reference that supports my position as you have, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken. It’s good to see you being able to recognize your error, and are willing to make the needed adjustments.
Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"you have agreed with me "
You are nuts, teabaggie.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Proves you were and still are wrong.
It’s good to see you being able to recognize your error, and are willing to make the needed adjustments. Adopting the reference that supports my position as you have, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken.
Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Proves you were and still are wrong.
Thank you.
It’s good to see you being able to recognize your error, and are willing to make the needed adjustments. Adopting the reference that supports my position as you have, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"Thank you."
You're welcome.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Proves you were and still are wrong.
Adopting the reference that supports my position as you have, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken.
Thank you.
It’s good to see you being able to recognize your error, and are willing to make the needed adjustments.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"Thank you."
No problem.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Proves you were and still are wrong.
Thank you. Adopting the reference that supports my position as you have, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken. It’s good to see you being able to recognize your error, and are willing to make the needed adjustments.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"Thank you."
Any time.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Proves you were and still are wrong.
Thank you. It’s good to see you being able to recognize your error, and are willing to make the needed adjustments. Adopting the reference that supports my position as you have, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"Thank you. "
That's OK. It proves you wrong, but if you want to thank me for showing that, you're welcome, teabaggie.
Thank you. It’s good to see you being able to recognize your error, and are willing to make the needed adjustments.
Adopting, as you have, the reference that supports my position, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
" It’s good to see you being able to recognize your error,"
Where, teabaggie? All I'm doing is showing a reference that proves you wrong.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
Proves you are wrong, teabaggie.
Always has.
It’s good to see you being able to recognize your error, and are willing to make the needed adjustments. Thank you. Adopting, as you have, the reference that supports my position, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"the reference that supports my position"
No such reference appears here like that, teabaggie. Only one showing you were wrong and are lying, teabaggie.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
Proves you are wrong, teabaggie.
It’s good to see you being able to recognize your error, and are willing to make the needed adjustments. Adopting, as you have, the reference that supports my position, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken. Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
@ #189 "... Proves you are wrong ..."
You are mistaken; it shows that I am correct.
Focusing in a bit more closely, "... some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in ...", it is clear that when infinities of this nature crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
The reference does support my position, that in certain instances infinity is considered a problem in Physics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"@ #189 “… Proves you are wrong …”
You are mistaken; it shows that I am correct."
You are mistaken. It shows you are wrong and I am correct.
Yet you are such an ignoramus that you do not comprehend the problem, do you. Your ego is so immense that you will not consider there is one, hence your rampant hipocrisy, teabaggie.
The singularity is not an infinity, the singularity is not known to be there in a black hole, infinities are not a problem in physics, they are a problem in mathematics. And every single way possible your claims are asinine, moronic, and those of a 12 year old trying to impress teacher with their smarts that they do not have.
But you are such an incompetent blowhard, teabaggie, you cannot comprehend the problem with that quote and that it proves you wrong by showing how infinities and singularities are not the same thing and how they are not a problem but are a normal method for solving a multi-valued output like eigenvalues by the method of normalisation.
And you are such an incompetent asshat that you are incapable of seeing that just making some random-ass quote and proclaiming it to prove you right is asinine, even though you refuse to accept my claim proven by quoting it and claiming it proves me right.
Because you're an egomaniac and an ignorant and incompetent twat who hasn't the first clue about science and doesn't even know what it means.
“… some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in …”
The ultraviolet catastrophe.
NOT black holes, reatard.
Which is why you were proven wrong with your claim that it was the black hole.
The FACT that you elided the quote JUST AT THAT POINT indicates that to some minor extent you know the problem, but your rampant and unquenchable ego refused to let you know you were wrong. Because being wrong is, to you, a PERSONAL ATTACK.
Because, as said before, teabaggie, you're a massive wankstain with a massive ego and a complete and utter incomprehension of what reality says when it goes against your preferences.
Even denier does better than you by far. And he's a fucking fruitloop on climate.
It’s good to see you being able to recognize your mistake and are willing to make the needed adjustments. Adopting, as you have, the reference that supports my position, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken. Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"the reference that supports my position"
Still doesn't teabaggie.
Good to know your ego is actually, really ACTUALLY blind to reality. Your insanity makes it easier to deal with you.
It’s good to see you being able to recognize your error and are willing to make the needed corrections. Adopting, as you have, the reference that supports my position, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken. Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
I see you're still batshit crazy, teabaggie. Totally incompetent at everything. You are such an ignoramus that you do not comprehend the problem, do you. Your ego is so immense that you will not consider there is one, hence your rampant hipocrisy, teabaggie.
The singularity is not an infinity, the singularity is not known to be there in a black hole, infinities are not a problem in physics, they are a problem in mathematics. And every single way possible your claims are asinine, moronic, and those of a 12 year old trying to impress teacher with their smarts that they do not have.
But you are such an incompetent blowhard, teabaggie, you cannot comprehend the problem with that quote and that it proves you wrong by showing how infinities and singularities are not the same thing and how they are not a problem but are a normal method for solving a multi-valued output like eigenvalues by the method of normalisation.
And you are such an incompetent asshat that you are incapable of seeing that just making some random-ass quote and proclaiming it to prove you right is asinine, even though you refuse to accept my claim proven by quoting it and claiming it proves me right.
Because you’re an egomaniac and an ignorant and incompet
"I see you’re still batshit crazy ..."
I, on the other hand am pleased to see you being able to recognize your mistake and being willing to make the needed corrections. Adopting, as you have, the reference that supports my position, you have agreed with me that you were mistaken. Thank you.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You see what you want to be real, teabaggie, and reality can go hang. You are such an ignoramus that you do not comprehend the problem, do you. Your ego is so immense that you will not consider there is one, hence your rampant hipocrisy, teabaggie.
The singularity is not an infinity, the singularity is not known to be there in a black hole, infinities are not a problem in physics, they are a problem in mathematics. And every single way possible your claims are asinine, moronic, and those of a 12 year old trying to impress teacher with their smarts that they do not have.
But you are such an incompetent blowhard, teabaggie, you cannot comprehend the problem with that quote and that it proves you wrong by showing how infinities and singularities are not the same thing and how they are not a problem but are a normal method for solving a multi-valued output like eigenvalues by the method of normalisation.
And you are such an incompetent asshat that you are incapable of seeing that just making some random-ass quote and proclaiming it to prove you right is asinine, even though you refuse to accept my claim proven by quoting it and claiming it proves me right.
Because you’re an egomaniac and an ignorant and incompetent
“... reality can go hang. You are such an ignoramus that you do not comprehend the problem, do you. Your ego is so immense that you will not consider there is one …” etc. etc etc.
I'm glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
I'm saddened that you still think that you're right when you're so badly wrong, teabaggie.
But reality isn't anything you entertain in your little world. It doesn't do like you demand.
“… reality isn’t anything you entertain in your little world …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"“… reality isn’t anything you entertain in your little world …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad ..."
You see what you want to be real, teabaggie, and reality can go hang. You are such an ignoramus that you do not comprehend the problem, do you. Your ego is so immense that you will not consider there is one, hence your rampant hipocrisy, teabaggie.
The singularity is not an infinity, the singularity is not known to be there in a black hole, infinities are not a problem in physics, they are a problem in mathematics. And every single way possible your claims are asinine, moronic, and those of a 12 year old trying to impress teacher with their smarts that they do not have.
But you are such an incompetent blowhard, teabaggie, you cannot comprehend the problem with that quote and that it proves you wrong by showing how infinities and singularities are not the same thing and how they are not a problem but are a normal method for solving a multi-valued output like eigenvalues by the method of normalisation.
And you are such an incompetent asshat that you are incapable of seeing that just making some random-ass quote and proclaiming it to prove you right is asinine, even though you refuse to accept my claim proven by quoting it and claiming it proves me right.
Because you’re an egomaniac and an ignorant and incompetent
“… Your ego is so immense that you will not consider there is one, hence your rampant hipocrisy …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"“… Your ego is so immense that you will not consider there is one, hence your rampant hipocrisy …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad ..."
You see what you want to be real, teabaggie, and reality can go hang. You are such an ignoramus that you do not comprehend the problem, do you. Your ego is so immense that you will not consider there is one, hence your rampant hipocrisy, teabaggie.
The singularity is not an infinity, the singularity is not known to be there in a black hole, infinities are not a problem in physics, they are a problem in mathematics. And every single way possible your claims are asinine, moronic, and those of a 12 year old trying to impress teacher with their smarts that they do not have.
But you are such an incompetent blowhard, teabaggie, you cannot comprehend the problem with that quote and that it proves you wrong by showing how infinities and singularities are not the same thing and how they are not a problem but are a normal method for solving a multi-valued output like eigenvalues by the method of normalisation.
And you are such an incompetent asshat that you are incapable of seeing that just making some random-ass quote and proclaiming it to prove you right is asinine, even though you refuse to accept my claim proven by quoting it and claiming it proves me right.
Because you’re an egomaniac and an ignorant and incompetent
“… You see what you want …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"“… You see what you want …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad ..."
To be insulted?
You see what you want to be real, teabaggie, and reality can go hang. You are such an ignoramus that you do not comprehend the problem, do you. Your ego is so immense that you will not consider there is one, hence your rampant hipocrisy, teabaggie.
The singularity is not an infinity, the singularity is not known to be there in a black hole, infinities are not a problem in physics, they are a problem in mathematics. And every single way possible your claims are asinine, moronic, and those of a 12 year old trying to impress teacher with their smarts that they do not have.
But you are such an incompetent blowhard, teabaggie, you cannot comprehend the problem with that quote and that it proves you wrong by showing how infinities and singularities are not the same thing and how they are not a problem but are a normal method for solving a multi-valued output like eigenvalues by the method of normalisation.
And you are such an incompetent asshat that you are incapable of seeing that just making some random-ass quote and proclaiming it to prove you right is asinine, even though you refuse to accept my claim proven by quoting it and claiming it proves me right.
Because you’re an egomaniac and an ignorant and incompetent
“… But you are such an incompetent blowhard …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"“… But you are such an incompetent blowhard …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad ..."
That youre an incompetent blowhard?
You see what you want to be real, teabaggie, and reality can go hang. You are such an ignoramus that you do not comprehend the problem, do you. Your ego is so immense that you will not consider there is one, hence your rampant hipocrisy, teabaggie.
The singularity is not an infinity, the singularity is not known to be there in a black hole, infinities are not a problem in physics, they are a problem in mathematics. And every single way possible your claims are asinine, moronic, and those of a 12 year old trying to impress teacher with their smarts that they do not have.
But you are such an incompetent blowhard, teabaggie, you cannot comprehend the problem with that quote and that it proves you wrong by showing how infinities and singularities are not the same thing and how they are not a problem but are a normal method for solving a multi-valued output like eigenvalues by the method of normalisation.
And you are such an incompetent asshat that you are incapable of seeing that just making some random-ass quote and proclaiming it to prove you right is asinine, even though you refuse to accept my claim proven by quoting it and claiming it proves me right.
Because you’re an egomaniac and an ignorant and incompetent
“… you cannot comprehend the problem with that quote…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
… you cannot comprehend the problem with that quote…” etc. etc etc.
You knobeating fuckqitted moronic retarded twatfeature!
Your god is a piece of shit out of money crack whore.
You don't listen to a frigging thing, so it doesn't matter what I say.
And it doesn't change the fact that you're a retard who is entirely wrong and incapable of accepting it.
“… You don’t listen to a frigging thing, so it doesn’t matter what I say.…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
So you enjoy your life of renting out your arsehole to drug runners from Somalia, teabaggie. Well, it's certainly in keeping with your immorality and explains your insanities, but it's hardly something necessary to tell everyone about on a public blog.
“… you enjoy your life of renting out your arsehole to drug runners from Somalia.…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Well, yes, I'm afraid that wanting to get into your grandmothers' casket at her funeral service while naked is rather frowned upon, teabaggie, but again, this is not a confession you should be making here on starts with a bang. That isn't the "bang" this site's title is going on about.
“… , this is not a confession you should be making here on starts with a bang.…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
No, tbaggie, nobody here wants to see photos of you smearing yourself with the shit from your dog's latest bout of the squitters. I don't even know if anyone else could stomach seeing something like that, what with your copious body sores on display.
“… nobody here wants to see photos .…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You are not a nigerian prince, teabggie, we KNOW that this is just a scam to get money advances from gullible morons. Yes, we know it worked on you, but you're a retard. We know about that scam.
“… we know it worked .…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
No, teaaggie, eating pencils will not make you smarter, even if you sharpened them beforehand. And definitely not if you have been shoving them up your arsehole first.
“… make you smarter .…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Please stop telling people what your poop tastes like, teabaggie, nobody is interested.
“Please stop telling peopler .…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
There's nothing about your nostrils that is unusual, teabaggie, not even if god is living in them like you insist.
“There’s nothing about .…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Well, yes teabaggie, you are completely ignorant of everything in the universeand have completely failed to learn anything from your pre-school teaching, despite hving been in there for the last 84 years, waiting for potty training to sink in.
I am glad you're finally getting the point and have worked out that your problem is due to your incompetence.
“... you are completely ignorant of everything .…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
You are finally working out that I've been right all along, teabaggie. Well it's nice of oyu to apologize for being such a fuckwitted moron and it is nice of you to apologise so profusely for your insane dribblings.
Keep it up, teabaggie!
“… it is nice of you .…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Absolutely, I am abslutely correct again, thank you for finally admitting your incompetence and idiocy.
Certainly took you long enough!
“… abslutely correct again, thank you .…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Yes, teabaggie, like you say I'm absolutely correct and you are a festering pustule in the backside of humanity. Nice term you used there. Quite poetic.
“… like you say I’m absolutely .…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Oh, no teabaggi, no you you should NOT be glad to have copulated with all 17 dogs whelped by your granddad's old terrier cross breed, even if your tiny penis seems to fit their genital opening.
“… you you should.…” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Yes, teabaggie, you HAVE been a retarded NOMA insisting shithead, good that you finally admit it, along with how you've been lying your arse off to try to get some of your dribblings accepted as valid.
So well done for admitting these and all the other massive failures of your life above. Very brave of you.
“… So well done …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Yes,teabaggie, I've been right all along and you've been a lying little shitstain.
“… been right all along …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Andyou will never change, either, will you. Because you do not have the mental capacity for change. It's just completely beyond you, as is any coherent rationality or honest.
Which is why you gravitated to your christan cult.
“… is why you gravitated …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
Excellent, teabaggie, you ahve no answer to my rebuttal to your asinine and moronic claims, so you bleat them out unadjusted for reality instead to hide the gaping hole in your mind.
As expected.
Do you have anything to support your currently wrong proclamations, or are you left with the same nonsensical rubbish you have posted before?
I'm betting the "same nonsensical rubbish" option is your go-to response.
“… option is your go …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
As expected, you have nothing new to supply and therefore you failed to support your insistence that there were infinities in a black hole.
So all you have left is repeating debunked and bullshit claims, which you will do forever more, because you really can't handle being wrong.
“… new to supply and …” etc. etc etc.
I’m glad you recognize that that when infinities of this nature (the mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit.) crop up, it is a problem for the theory where it occurs.
“Many theories in physics have mathematical singularities of one kind or another. Equations for these physical theories predict that the ball of mass of some quantity becomes infinite or increases without limit. This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory, as in the Ultraviolet Catastrophe, re-normalization, and instability of a hydrogen atom predicted by the Larmor formula.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
"... your insistence that there were infinities in a black hole...."
It would appear that you have not read the quoted passage or the linked article.
Here is the first sentence: "A gravitational singularity or space-time singularity is a location in space-time where the gravitational field of a celestial body becomes infinite in a way that does not depend on the coordinate system."
Perhaps you don not accept that. You are entitled to your opinion.
However, the general consensus is that, yes, there is a singularity within a black hole, and yes, that is where the gravitational field of a celestial body becomes infinite.
Now, continuing with the article, "This is generally a sign for a missing piece in the theory."
Perhaps you don not accept that. You are entitled to your opinion.
The general consensus is however that, yes, there is a singularity within a black hole, and as QM does not permit particles to inhabit a space smaller than their wavelengths, this singularity, where the gravitational field becomes infinite is considered a problem, as that is where Physics ends.
"So all you have left is repeating debunked and bullshit claims ..."
The general consensus is that neither QM nor GR are debunked.
Perhaps you do not accept that. You are entitled to your opinion.
Cutting and pasting again?
No news there.
"Cutting and pasting again?"
At #10, retard. From #8. Your previous post made, you feculant shitstain.
"... you feculant shitstain."
More snappy repartee!
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/File:2014-09-19-1062sea.png
"Sealioning involves jumping into a conversation with endless polite, reasonable questions ..."
This is an unusual and laudable change in your posting verbiage.
A praiseworthy step in the right direction.
Keep up the good work!
Aaaaand the winner is ....
[envelope please] - JOHN!
It's been days without another "Yes you did!", "No I didn't!" comment. I've been watching this bickering with great amusement. Thank you, John and Wow!
Uh, win is "gets the last word in"?
What, exactly, was won? And great alt-reality again there. But why did you whine and whinge and moan about it when you were enjoying it?
Are you ALWAYS a self-negating retard, Carl? Or is this something you engage in deliberately, you actively insist on making your own posts contradicting yourself?
Because either is fucking nuts.
Maybe it's endemic with 'merkins. Maybe they can't help but be morons, because they have the self control and intelligence of a two year old. Without the excuse of still developing their brain.
And I love you too, Wow!
My apologies to all, I hadn't read Ethan's comment summary discussing this thread. I was out of line for stirring the pot; shouldn't have done that, and I'm sorry.
OK, if you were not deliberately shit stirring, I withdraw most of my comment against yours, carl.
I will point out that your asinine claim of "the winner is.... the one who said shit last" is why it went on and on and on and on and on and on and ....
Because morons like yourself believe bullshit like that.
So next time you see someone not stopping an argument and giving up on a moron who isn't listening, instead of shouting down both parties for not giving up, look in the mirror and tell yourself off for believing that getting the last word in being winning the argument is because of you.
That others do so does not absolve you of your fault. Kiddie porn isn't made legitimate if we find out a lot of people engaged in it. Even if kiddie fiddlers use argumentum ad populum to salve their conscience (if they have one).
When I studied Engineering, many years ago, we were told "it is usually safe to extrapolate about one order of magnitude from what we have observed". We can observe the behaviour of a beam of light, under fully controlled conditions, for about 10 msec. We have no way of independently confirming any astronomical observation, so it is totally pointless talking about 'Big Bangs', or the like, let alone trying to make any predictions as to what it all means. In my opinion if something sounds like nonsense it probably is, and as there is no way any of you can ever prove me wrong in any remotely realistic time frame, you are all just wasting your time. It may be fun, but it is all just daydreaming.
Cassowandra
There has been no doubt in my mind since a young child (ie before age 5) knowing there is another being making the different decision from me and proceeding onwards. Shes (ie plural of she) makes another decision/action and sheses continue onwards. They never reconnect. My failing came with the realizations there wasn’t enough 'spaces' for the outcomes, but perhaps I too think in a box - an expanded box, but a finity.
Our beings are raised in boxes, in acreages, in political lines… in earths. Our ability to comprehend no walls, no lines, no gravity doesn’t exist. But it exists, I am sure.
(and what color? colors we have never imagined and cannot see in this our universe - as I see colors in numbers)