Sorry, Donald Trump, It Can't Be Infinity (Synopsis)

“There are two infinities that confuse me: the one in my soul devours me; the one around me will crush me” -Gustave Flaubert

Last week, Donald Trump restored the National Space Council, promising to take America and the world to new heights in space. He also made some statements claiming that this is infinity here, and that we don’t know, but it could be infinity. In both cases, the statements don’t quite match the facts, as the funding cuts proposed by the President are inconsistent with increased exploration efforts, and, more to the point, we know we’ll never access infinity.

Looking back to great cosmic distances is akin to looking back in time. We are 13.8 billion years since the Big Bang where we are, but the Big Bang also occurred everywhere else we can see. The light-travel-time to those galaxies means we're seeing those distant regions as they were in the past. Image credit: NASA, ESA and A. Feild (STScI).

That includes, by the way, even if we wait around for an infinite amount of time! The amount of Universe that we can reach is finite and quantified; the amount of Universe we can observe today is finite and quantified; and the full suite of things that will ever impart information, photons, particles, etc., to us is finite and quantified. It can’t be infinity, as we’ve learned by doing science.

The observable (yellow) and reachable (magenta) portions of the Universe, which are what they are thanks to the expansion of space and the energy components of the Universe. Image credit: E. Siegel, based on work by Frederic Michel and Andrew Z. Colvin of Wikimedia Commons.

Don’t bring your uninformed opinion to a matter that can be settled by scientific fact, but rather bring an open mind and a willingness to learn. There’s a whole Universe out there worth knowing!

More like this

“Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will…
Another piece of junk that I received: "The Invisible Link Between Mathematics and Theology", by a guy named "Ladislav Kvasz", published in a rag called "Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith". (I'm not going to quote much from this, because the way that the PDF is formatted, it requires a…
"The history of astronomy is a history of receding horizons." -Edwin Hubble As you look to greater and greater distances, you’re looking back in time in the Universe. But thanks to dark energy, what we can see and access today isn’t always going to be accessible. As galaxies grow more distant with…
“If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is, Infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro' narrow chinks of his cavern.” -William Blake When it comes to the ultimate question of the size of the Universe, we have to look to greater…

Perhaps we will know infinity when we are astrally harvested.

By Mentifex (Arth… (not verified) on 06 Jul 2017 #permalink

Maybe Trump figured since Buzz Lightyear says it, perhaps it's legit, and decided to go with it.

If there is one thing his lifetime of experience will have taught him, it's that Adam Savage was right - he really can reject our reality and substitute his own.

@Ethan,
So....you really have nothing to say this time? Maybe you should keep your mouth shut then...until you actually have a topic of conversation besides 'Trump isn't using the word infinity correctly.' Sheesh Ethan. Get a life, or at least a clue.

Here's a topic worth discussing, the climate record being adjusted for political effect.
.
https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-r…

CFT,

Oh pooh! Let Ethan fuss if he feels the need. It’s his blog and he feels his ox is being gored. Let him vent.

People wonder why the current president is viewed as a massive embarrassment: his meaningless jumble of words in that "speech" should be one of the primary points of evidence.

Tronald Dump strikes again (& again .....)