Why wikipedia is like eternal life

Well not in all respects of course. Sometimes people die. But before I get on to that...

Have you noticed that I haven't posted much recently? I've been on holidays. Wales is very nice, I recommend it. I'll go again. That is Castell-y-Bere, if you don't recognise it.

Where was I? Oh yes...

The thing I'm referring to is the way memories fade. There is a wonderful book by KSR called "Icehenge" which you should read, wherein parts of the plot revolve around the way that, although people live for centuries due to strange drugs, they still have the same brains and the same fallible memories trying to store more and more stuff, with the result that people forget their own presence at, and even the interpretation or existence of, important historical events.

And the same thing happens on wikipedia. My most recent example is me and User:BigTimePeace who I had tagged in my mind as one of my many enemies, though I had forgotten why. When I eventually felt moved to complain, it turned out that I had nothing to complain about [1], or if I had I had forgotten what, and couldn't be bothered to look up the diffs, even though in theory they are available. Part of the lesson may be to keep better records; I've made a start at the curse of gnome.

And since this seems as good a place as any: will people start leaving their heirs their gmail passwords in their wills? I now have a large part of my life stored online, I hope it doesn't die, though I can't see who would want to wade through it all.


More like this

Quacks really hate Wikipedia. It's understandable, really. Wikipedia has some fairly tight standards regulating its form and content. Quacks, thinking that because anybody can edit Wikipedia articles it must mean that they can edit the entries on their favorite bit of woo to their hearts' content…
Once again, please don't forget about our DonorsChoose drive! Please click in the panel to you left, and go make a donation to help schools get the supplies they need to be able to teach math! Most people must have heard by now that about a week ago, T-mobile released the first Android based…
Some current news in the Linuxosphere, and some things going on on my very own desktop, have me wondering about the nature of the Linux Desktop. Here are a few questions to ponder. Are Gnome and Ubuntu ruining the Linux Desktop? And if they are, what do we do about it? Is Linux currently at a…
And I was. It was the dreaded Seven Random and Weird things meme! It's on the loose and I've been tagged. The rules are: Link to the person that tagged you and post the rules on your blog. Share 7 random and or weird things about yourself. Tag 7 random people at the end of your post and include…

I just wanted to say that Castell y Bere is my favourite place. Thanks for the pic!

> will people start leaving their heirs their ...
> passwords in their wills?

We need a system for storing some huge unguessable untypable long string somewhere that can be released to transfer the account up on proof of death, or something like that.

Can you imagine trying to keep your heirs updated every time you change a password?

But of course Google will continue mining your records forever.

Heck, Google is probably prepared to offer your heirs access -- for a price -- to your GoogleGhost. Or else sell your GoogleGhost's opinions in focus groups to companies that want such.

You've read Source of the Nile, I trust?
The Sources of the Nile, F&SF Jan 1961, Avram Davidson

[No; but now I'll be forced to have a look :-( -W]

I think Google has built the equivalent tool for being able to stay out in front of the markets by knowing everything that people are starting to ask about now and will be wanting next week.

By Hank Roberts (not verified) on 05 Aug 2009 #permalink

William, you are such an arrogant twit. It's got nothing to do with your scientific POV, which I tend to agree with. It's all those many. many times you've abused your Wiki-powers.

In fact, you're so arrogant, I'm going to push for a new subboard on Wikipedia Review, dedicated to your glory.

[Please do. Can you make sure that you spell my name right, though? It is so hard finding myself when people use one of the many many misspellings, e.g. http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=17981&hl=connelley -W]

By metasonix (not verified) on 05 Aug 2009 #permalink

Wales, great land, nice people, the food sucks.

OTOH, what you want to do is encode your Emails so they disappear down the Rabett hole when you pass

The longer I've been on Wikipedia, the more I have thought about this problem. I come across these names that I recognise, but can't recall whether it's because I like them, or dislike them. Then there are these people who I started off thinking badly of, but over time they change into someone I find myself agreeing with. Was I wrong to begin with? Am I wrong now? Or have they just grown up a little? After all, while five years isn't a long time when you're my age, it's a huge chunk of your life when you're in your teens or twenties...

As for gmail passwords - after my brother died, my sister took possession of his laptop. Given the wonder of saved passwords, I assume she has inherited access to his online life. Which seems only proper, to me.

As for gmail passwords - after my brother died, my sister took possession of his laptop. Given the wonder of saved passwords, I assume she has inherited access to his online life. Which seems only proper

As for gmail passwords - after my brother died, my sister took possession of his laptop. Given the wonder of saved passwords,

Iâve also often wondered what happens to peoplesâ little enclaves of electronic life after they leave this orb. Iâm sure most of us would hope the blasted passwords can never be deciphered, lol. Besides work, files of family photos, and calendar dates noted, I would think many use a comp as a less than âopen to the publicâ storage facility. Iâm having a special chip implanted in my person so that upon my demise my E-life goes out with a bang, heh.