Poor Richard Tol. He has been invited (nominated by the Oirish Gummit, apparently) to be a convening author, though only for WG II.
But all he can do is whinge that "Political interference in the IPCC continues" because they won't provide him a blank cheque for his travel costs. Diddums. I'm sure you can all see the interference inherent in the system. Still, at least he is better than RP Jr, who refuses (for some reason he does not trouble to explain) to take part. So he can be outside the tent pissing in, would be my guess. Or he might be jealous of Tol getting *convening* lead author, perhaps [update: scuttlebutt confirms this interpretation].
OTOH, this one on fossil fuel subsidies is worth reading.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Eventually I decided to tone down the headline; Curry is wrong about a great many things, I think, but let's be polite. So, all this is prompted by her Q+A for Keith Kloor. I fear I am going to have to read it. All of this segues into the "tribalist" stuff that I'm going to have to write sometime;…
There's a fair section of the - errm - normally-sane-side-of-the-climate-wars blogosphere that regards RP Jr as the spawn of the devil. Eli weighs in complaining about Nate Silver of 538 getting RP to write for him (Eli has form, dontchaknow). Now I'd be the first to agree that RP has said some…
Richard Tol and the 97% consensus – again! Need I say more?
OTOH, he isn't a bozo. [Update: still sane, still a bit of a twat; heading downhill.]
Refs
* Richard Tol is being oppressed!
* Big City Lib on the GWPF (P3) and BCL himself
* The necessity of TOBS - Moyhu
* Flurry Of Scientists, Recent…
This is my first contribution for "Ask Stoat", and I'm doing it because it is low hanging fruit :-). I was going to do the even lower-hanging "airbourne fraction" but that will come. This is for Brian.
So, the issue is in the news because of the 2350 / 2035 kerfuffle, and links to Brian's other…
I don't get Richard Tol. Earlier this year he was heavily involved in a campaign to displace the head of the IPCC, and was still permitted to promote that campaign on the Wikipedia talk page of the biography of that leader.
The "being permitted" part isn't what upset me really. It was that anybody would even begin to think that such behavior was defensible. I just cannot fathom how such thinking works. My instinct is to move away, to disengage. It's completely beyond the pale.
Going back to Tol's complaint, it seems to revolve around the fact that they nominated him for an IPCC role in AR5 despite their substantive political differences with his positions. In this Tol nevertheless reads political interference because they decline his request for money.
Maybe we need to go back to first principles on this.
Which bodies are empowered to nominate candidates for such positions?
[Interesting question. I was never involved, in my time, and perhaps the rules have shifted. I think any national government can nominate people. Quite who gets to choose is less clear. Formally, I imagine that any disputes are resolved by the actual Panel - i.e., by govt reps. But I also think that it is not the practice for disputes to need resolving. Certainly in terms of WGI there are few enough credible coordingating lead authors, and the task is more a matter of persuading these few people that they really do want to give up all their time for little gain -W]
Do such bodies include Tol's own government, or any professional associations he may belong to?
[I think only goverments -W]
Have any such bodies, besides the Irish government, ever nominated Tol for such a position?
Is it the practice of such bodies to grant a bursary?
Tony:
IPCC authors are nominated by their governments or by the IPCC. I have been nominated by Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, and the IPCC in previous rounds, and by Ireland and the Netherlands in the current round.
Travel costs for LAs are covered by their government (for rich countries) or the IPCC (for poor countries). CLAs get additional support, because it is six months work.
Wouldn't it be just the same political interference when the Irish government would have said: Go on Richard, we like your style, here's your travel grant? Of course, but I doubt Tol or Pielke would've complained then. The obvious solution would be to boost IPCC funding, and let the secretariat reimburse everyone who travels on behalf of the IPCC.
See Rabett Run