Above is not (see comments) a picture of Charles Darwin, taken obviously in his later years. He commented that "I like this photograph much better than any other which has been taken of me." The original is in the Beinecke Library at Yale.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Two hundred years ago today, in the little country town of Shrewsbury, Shropshire, Charles Robert Darwin was born. No one then could have known that, fifty years and nine months later, Charles would deliver a treatise that would forever change our understanding of our place in nature. That is…
The American mastodon (Mammut americanum), illustrated in one of Cuvier's memoirs.
When I taking biology in high school science seemed so simple. Lyell was a uniformitarian hero, Cuvier was a brillant anatomist (but sadly a narrow-minded catastrophist), Charles Darwin was the hero of all biology…
For Darwin's Birthday Weekend, a reposting of my review of David Dobb's Reef Madness:
Reef Madness: Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral is a book about the origins of modern science, the interplay between theory and empiricism, the machinations of the Victorian scientific…
Reef Madness: Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral is a book about the origins of modern science, the interplay between theory and empiricism, the machinations of the Victorian scientific gentry, epic rivalries, polyps and plankton.
Reef Madness is by David Dobbs, of Neuron…
Ummm... I don't know who that is, but it ain't Chuck. Haeckel perhaps?
The photo appeared in the Nov/Dec 2005 edition of Historically Speaking: The Bulletin of the Historical Society in an article by Ed Larson. I'm guessing that it's kosher. I - and they - could be wrong though.
All these old Victorians with beards look the same after awhile!
Looks like Michael Ruse in costume.
Hmmm. If you search the Beinecke image collection, that image does turn up, and it is labeled "Darwin". I've never seen it before, though.
The hair is weird. The mustache is trimmed way, way back, the beard is cropped oddly, and that fly-away stuff on his head is distracting. But that nose...it could be him.
Here is a direct link to the picture at the Beinecke.
I think I really like this picture. I don't know why, just that I do. Perhaps it's because he looks less "iconic" and more "human". Umm.
No way that's Chuck. Someone has screwed up somewhere, or is playing a joke. I was at Down House in the UK a few weeks back, and they had a portrait or photo on the wall, with that exact script below it -- but it definitely wasn't that photo.
I will do a little digging.
Nick
I think this is the correct photo that goes with the inscription:
http://www.photography-museum.com/darwinlg.html
Note that the actual Darwin note is "I like this photograph *very* much better than any other which has been taken of me." Googling the quote lacking the word "very" brings up only references to the bogus photo, whereas the actual quote brings up the above photo and lots of hits to pages mirroring the Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, vol. 2.
Nick
The plot thickens. If you look at the original at the Beinecke, it too has written - in what looks like Darwin's writing - "I like this photograph very much better than any other which has been taken of me". It too is by Julia Margaret Cameron.
Well, looking through the Yale archives for Julia Margaret Cameron's photos...
http://beinecke.library.yale.edu/dl_crosscollex/SearchExecXC.asp?srchty…
...the alleged "Darwin" photo looks kind of like another photo in the Cameron collection, of one Thoby Prinsep:
http://beinecke.library.yale.edu/dl_crosscollex/photoneg/oneITEM.asp?pi…
...short mustache, right length beard, frizzy hair on bald head -- the Mystery Photo certainly looks more like Prinsep than Chuck.
I think we've got a major blogscoop here if both Yale and Historically Speaking: The Bulletin of the Historical Society have screwed this one up. Someone blog it if they figure it out definitively.
PS: One of Darwin's children took some candid family photos, this could conceivably be one, but I think I would have seen it before.
Well, looking through the Yale archives for Julia Margaret Cameron's photos...
http://beinecke.library.yale.edu/dl_crosscollex/SearchExecXC.asp?srchty…
...the alleged "Darwin" photo looks kind of like another photo in the Cameron collection, of one Thoby Prinsep:
http://beinecke.library.yale.edu/dl_crosscollex/photoneg/oneITEM.asp?pi…
...short mustache, right length beard, frizzy hair on bald head -- the Mystery Photo certainly looks more like Prinsep than Chuck.
I think we've got a major blogscoop here if both Yale and Historically Speaking: The Bulletin of the Historical Society have screwed this one up. Someone blog it if they figure it out definitively.
PS: One of Darwin's children took some candid family photos, this could conceivably be one, but I think I would have seen it before.
Hey John,
I sent another post that requires moderation with my guess at who is in the photo (Thoby Prinsep, another subject of Julia Margaret Cameron in the database). Probably I sent too many posts in a short time.
Nick
Nick,
Yeah, I think you are right. It looks like Prinsep. Would be interesting to find the source for the photo. If I get a chance, I'll email the library and see what they say.
Mystery solved ... sort of.