Above is not (see comments) a picture of Charles Darwin, taken obviously in his later years. He commented that "I like this photograph much better than any other which has been taken of me." The original is in the Beinecke Library at Yale.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Two hundred years ago today, in the little country town of Shrewsbury, Shropshire, Charles Robert Darwin was born. No one then could have known that, fifty years and nine months later, Charles would deliver a treatise that would forever change our understanding of our place in nature. That is…
I make no secret that I admire Darwin as a historical figure very much, but I recently submitted a paper for an open access journal for science teachers at secondary level named Resonance, entitled "Not Saint Darwin". I was motivated by some of the rather uncritical, unhistorical and unnecessary…
Last month everyone was all a-twitter about the big screen Charles Darwin biopic, Creation. The film, based upon the biography Annie's Box, was released in England with great fanfare, but whether it would come to the United States was another question altogether. A U.S. distributor was hard to come…
From his instance that human evolution has halted to his rather crummy review of Stephen Jay Gould: Reflections on His View of Life (see my thoughts on the book here), Steve Jones has been raising the hackles of his colleagues more than usual lately. Given that I am not a scientist I cannot count…
Ummm... I don't know who that is, but it ain't Chuck. Haeckel perhaps?
The photo appeared in the Nov/Dec 2005 edition of Historically Speaking: The Bulletin of the Historical Society in an article by Ed Larson. I'm guessing that it's kosher. I - and they - could be wrong though.
All these old Victorians with beards look the same after awhile!
Looks like Michael Ruse in costume.
Hmmm. If you search the Beinecke image collection, that image does turn up, and it is labeled "Darwin". I've never seen it before, though.
The hair is weird. The mustache is trimmed way, way back, the beard is cropped oddly, and that fly-away stuff on his head is distracting. But that nose...it could be him.
Here is a direct link to the picture at the Beinecke.
I think I really like this picture. I don't know why, just that I do. Perhaps it's because he looks less "iconic" and more "human". Umm.
No way that's Chuck. Someone has screwed up somewhere, or is playing a joke. I was at Down House in the UK a few weeks back, and they had a portrait or photo on the wall, with that exact script below it -- but it definitely wasn't that photo.
I will do a little digging.
Nick
I think this is the correct photo that goes with the inscription:
http://www.photography-museum.com/darwinlg.html
Note that the actual Darwin note is "I like this photograph *very* much better than any other which has been taken of me." Googling the quote lacking the word "very" brings up only references to the bogus photo, whereas the actual quote brings up the above photo and lots of hits to pages mirroring the Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, vol. 2.
Nick
The plot thickens. If you look at the original at the Beinecke, it too has written - in what looks like Darwin's writing - "I like this photograph very much better than any other which has been taken of me". It too is by Julia Margaret Cameron.
Well, looking through the Yale archives for Julia Margaret Cameron's photos...
http://beinecke.library.yale.edu/dl_crosscollex/SearchExecXC.asp?srchty…
...the alleged "Darwin" photo looks kind of like another photo in the Cameron collection, of one Thoby Prinsep:
http://beinecke.library.yale.edu/dl_crosscollex/photoneg/oneITEM.asp?pi…
...short mustache, right length beard, frizzy hair on bald head -- the Mystery Photo certainly looks more like Prinsep than Chuck.
I think we've got a major blogscoop here if both Yale and Historically Speaking: The Bulletin of the Historical Society have screwed this one up. Someone blog it if they figure it out definitively.
PS: One of Darwin's children took some candid family photos, this could conceivably be one, but I think I would have seen it before.
Well, looking through the Yale archives for Julia Margaret Cameron's photos...
http://beinecke.library.yale.edu/dl_crosscollex/SearchExecXC.asp?srchty…
...the alleged "Darwin" photo looks kind of like another photo in the Cameron collection, of one Thoby Prinsep:
http://beinecke.library.yale.edu/dl_crosscollex/photoneg/oneITEM.asp?pi…
...short mustache, right length beard, frizzy hair on bald head -- the Mystery Photo certainly looks more like Prinsep than Chuck.
I think we've got a major blogscoop here if both Yale and Historically Speaking: The Bulletin of the Historical Society have screwed this one up. Someone blog it if they figure it out definitively.
PS: One of Darwin's children took some candid family photos, this could conceivably be one, but I think I would have seen it before.
Hey John,
I sent another post that requires moderation with my guess at who is in the photo (Thoby Prinsep, another subject of Julia Margaret Cameron in the database). Probably I sent too many posts in a short time.
Nick
Nick,
Yeah, I think you are right. It looks like Prinsep. Would be interesting to find the source for the photo. If I get a chance, I'll email the library and see what they say.
Mystery solved ... sort of.