Roy Torcaso, "sort of difficult, very firm in his beliefs, or nonbeliefs," R.I.P.

Roy Torcaso, 96, fought for the right to serve in public office without declaring his religious beliefs:

Mr. Torcaso, who said he was an atheist, was a bookkeeper by profession. He worked for a Bethesda construction company when his legal challenge started in 1959. He had been urged by his boss to become a notary public.

At the Montgomery County Circuit Court, he refused to swear to a state oath given to notaries public that made them profess the existence of God.

"The point at issue," he said at the time, "is not whether I believe in a Supreme Being, but whether the state has a right to inquire into my beliefs."

In 1961's Torcaso v. Watkins, the Supreme Court held that the requirement that he swear an oath declaring his religious faith was un-constitutional. "Neither [state nor federal government] can constitutionally pass laws or impose requirements which aid all religions as against non-believers, and neither can aid those religions based on a belief in the existence of God as against those religions founded on different beliefs," wrote Justice Black.

More like this

The AP reports In North Carolina, Lawsuit Is Threatened Over Councilmanâs Lack of Belief in God: Detractors of [recently elected city councilman Cecil] Bothwell⦠are threatening to take the city to court for swearing him in last week, even though the stateâs antiquated requirement that…
Wow, this guy is really a piece of work. Judge Moore is now appealing his ouster as Chief Justice of Alabama to the Supreme Court, claiming - and this is really funny - that his ouster established an "unconstitutional religious test for office". A religious test for office would be, for example, a…
The only two sure things in life are death and taxes, the old saying goes. I think by now we can safely add a third certainty - reading a Phyllis Schlafly column will leave you baffled that someone could write such nonsense with a straight face. Her latest column, about the Supreme Court's current…
Ed. note: This is a guest post on the ACLU lawsuit filed against the school board in Dover, Pennsylvania by Dan Ray. Dan is an attorney and the director of the Paralegal Studies Program at Eastern Michigan University. He studied in law school under the esteemed Jack Balkin of the Yale Law School.…

Good thing this case wasn't brought before the current Supremes. Maybe someday we'll be back to normal. The American way. The way the Founders envisioned it. Not the way ideological wingnuts see it.

Although I'm not a big fan of the current SC, I doubt they would find differently. The constitution is pretty clear on no religious tests to hold public office.

By Sam Lewis (not verified) on 28 Jun 2007 #permalink

True, we all have our own beliefs about the existence of God and each individual has the right to abide by what he believe is true and just. No other person can judge him for being different just because the other person thinks otherwise or has a different view about the existence of God.