HCR

Just watched the House pass the Health Care Reform bill. It's history at work, an achievement on the scale of Social Security and Medicare, a civil rights bill of a sort we haven't seen since the 1960s. President Obama, Speaker Pelosi, and indeed Majority Leader Reid all deserve to take a bow.

Even without the reconciliation sidecar, this is a massive improvement for millions of Americans â those with health insurance and those who wish they had it. And when the Senate takes up the reconciliation bill, it'll be an even bigger improvement.

This isn't just a tribute to the President and the leaders of the two houses of Congress. Obama and Reid and Pelosi enjoy their offices because people worked hard to get Democrats elected, specifically with the intent that they would fix the country's disastrous healthcare system. And finally, after a century of struggle, we have a system that extends health insurance access to all Americans, and that sets the stage for refinements (like those which have happened for the first 60 years of Social Security's history) which will ultimately ensure that every American has health insurance, not just theoretical access to it.

Not all see this quite as rosily as I do. My old Kansas friend j.d. thinks that the passage of a bill whose provisions enjoy majority support by a congress elected to enact such a law signifies that "self-governance is over." An anonymous Texas representative thinks that passing a bill which fails to prevent health insurance from covering a certain lifesaving medical procedure for women makes Bart Stupak (and others) "babykiller[s]." The Discovery Institute and former Bush officials join in the outrage that Democratic priorities lean more heavily toward insuring women than that traditional Republican goal of having women die in alleys. Mitt Romney, who passed a nearly identical bill as Massachusetts' governor, is now urging repeal of the federal bill (but not its state version), insisting: "The American people will not stand still for this bill becoming law ⦠they will throw those guys out." I'm guessing that'll earn him as many votes in 2012 as it did in 2008.

At the end of the day, I'll toast the victors and turn the mike over to Wonderella: "quit bitching about the health care thing. If you don't like it, move to Canada."

More like this

When the Senate can operate as the Founders meant â allowing simple majorities to pass legislation â things move tolerably fast. The House passed Affordable Care late on Sunday, the Senate passed the reconciliation sidecar (with small amendments) on Wednesday, and the House just passed the…
Having blown an easy win in the Massachusetts Senate race, DC Democrats seem intent on blowing the dreams of millions of Americans, and the best chance of reforming the health insurance industry to make it more equitable â a policy long held up as a major reason to vote Democratic. The Times…
Republican Senators have proposed one more bill to repeal the ACA. The Graham-Cassidy (or Cassidy-Graham) proposal would dramatically shrink the pool of federal money going to healthcare and revise how it’s distributed to states, in a way that is especially damaging to states that accepted the ACA’…
There were lots of reasons why I wanted to see Affordable Care (née healthcare reform) pass. Ending the tyranny of "pre-existing conditions," of cruel recissions, and insuring more than 30 million uninsured Americans were big reasons. But it wasn't a perfect bill, and there was a vocal group of…

Repeal the Bush and Reagan tax cuts.

I'm sure Josh can tell *exactly* how we're going to pay for this new bill. Go on Josh, enlighten us plueeze...

Yes! Great point Josh. Let's hope the new "health care" reform works just as well as Social Security where reductions in benefits were necessary to keep the program solvent.