Read the science fiction novel Heavy Weather by Bruce Sterling over the weekend. The story follows the lives of a bunch of unreasonable people who hack the weather - where hacking means getting in the middle of storms and capturing a lot of scientific data. The year is 2031 and the world is a dismal place with earth warmed-up and chaos abound. The story has enough pace to keep you going but does not provide much adrenaline rush. The main characters are all over the story but they are not sticky. Much of their background seems to be an afterthought. The scientific ideas are neat and that's what kept me going. A good read overall but not something I can recommend as a good story. In fiction, ideas are but embellishments for a good yarn, isn't it? You got to have a good story.
Heavy Weather by Bruce Sterling
Hooray! After days of anticipation, they are finally out!
After Lott claimed that biased news coverage of the shootings at the Appalachian School of Law deliberately omitted a defensive gun use, I did my own analysis of the news stories and found that the alleged bias was t
Robert Krulwich, speaking at the Caltech Commencement, issues a cri de coeur for the importance of stories, even (especially!) when speaking about science: