Biofortified pulls ahead in the race and our competitors cry "industry fixing"

An update from Karl Haro von Mogel:
"A little more than an hour after PZ's post, GM Watch in the UK has wildly claimed that the 'biotech industry' is fixing the contest!"

"The level of conspiracy theorizing reaches astronomical proportions at a moment's notice. Please keep voting, so they won't have the chance to use such falsehoods to attack us."

FYI: Biofortified is a completely independent venture started by two graduate students. It is independently run on a volunteer basis, and is not supported by any funding from any companies.

I work at a non-profit institution and the only thing I sell is my book (hey, maybe I will sell a couple more copies after all this!). Full disclosure: Fifteen years ago a few of my students were funded by industry grants for their graduate work. As for now, all my research is funded by non-profit institutions.

The only thing that Karl shills for are beeswax candles and honey that he gets from his bees.

Vote now, the competition ends in two days.

More like this

I was going to join PZ Myers, ERV, and Pamela Ronald in helping out an old blogging friend and former host of the Skeptics' Circle, Karl Mogel of The Inoculated Mind by pimping his other science-based blog Biofortified, which seeks to provide a science- and evidence-based discussion of plant…
Hello all, Biofortified is in the running to win the Ashoka Changemakers contest, GMO Risk or Rescue. But Karl Haro von Mogel needs your help, dear readers. The contest entries close on October 21, and the voting will continue to the 28th. The grand prize is a $1500 grant and a conversation with…
The Changemakers international online community selected biofortified, a group website devoted to providing factual information and fostering discussion about plant genetics, especially genetic engineering, as the grand prize winner in the GMO Risk or Rescue Competition. This would not have been…
Every so often, Boston proposes raising the voluntary contributions it asks non-profit organizations to pay in lieu of property taxes (and other taxes), or instituting a consistent fee (right now, these contributions are negotiated with each institution). From The Boston Globe: After 14 months, a…

Well that's the conspiracy mindset at work, although I would be interested to see how they link PZ to Monsanto. On the other hand, it must be infuriating to have a bunch of people vote for a blog they probably had never even heard of.

By David Hooks (not verified) on 26 Oct 2009 #permalink

Hi James

We do still sometimes gives talks and do book signings.

I hope to meet you sometime.

Thanks, I'll keep an eye open for one in the bay area!


It's depressing that some of these people are so irrational about the subject they can't imagine any reason for others to disagree besides being payed off by Monsanto.

Thanks for posting on this, Pam. Ack, I'll have to finish the candle website now that you've linked to it!

I just wanted to make it clear that our competitors, the Non-GMO Project, have not made the claims of competition-fixing, and have been supportive of our objection to GM Watch's claims. GM Watch is not in the competition at all, but are an onlooker.

What I think this really tells us is the quality of GM Watch's research tendencies. How many other claims in their "news" are made up as well? I know I read claims in their feed that say things like that there is widespread uproar over some issue somewhere. Uproar where? No reference.

Thanks for the clarification Karl
GM watch is Indeed a different organization from the non-GMO project

The nonGMO group needs to distance themselves from the false accusations on the GE watch site or their name is mud