Here is an illustration from a recent PLoS Biology paper:
Two complexes:
1- miRNA. Imperfect base pairing between the small RNA and the target. This complex sorts the RNA to p-bodies (processing bodies) where other proteins join in. The mRNA is either destroyed or stored.
2- siRNA. Perfect base pairing. The mRNA is destroyed and that's it.
A picture is worth a thousand words.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
miRNA and RNA interference is so hot right now ...
I'm not in the field, but I do keep an eye on it. Right now the there is quite a few papers on how miRNAs regulate translation. There is some data that indicate that miRNA and the associated RISC complex (RNA Interference Silencing Complex)…
I'm trying to raise money for the The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, and I promised to do a few things if we reached certain goals. I said I'd write a post microRNAs and cancer if you raised $7500. And you did, so I did. I kept my clothes on this time, though, so here's a more serious picture of…
Well two weeks ago in Science, two reports came out about yet another species of small RNA ... rasiRNA ... uhm ... piRNA (OK they haven't harmonized their nomenclature yet).
So here is a brief review of the types of RNA:
- mRNA (messenger RNA). These are the RNAs that encode polypeptide chains.
-…
Flipping through the latest issue of Cell:
Ujwal Sheth from Roy Parker's lab details the molecular mechanism that targets RNAs with premature stop codons to processing-bodies (or p-bodies) via the non-sense mediated decay (NMD) pathway. P-bodies are dense cytoplasmic granule-like structures that…
microPrimer: the biogenesis and function of microRNA
Tingting Du and Phillip D. Zamore
i think the major distinction is whether or not it started out as a pri-miRNA trancribed from an endogenous locus. if it was processed by Drosha it's a miRNA even if it has perfect target complementarity and causes cleavage.
I guess there are two ways to define them. miRNA are derived from endogenous small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), siRNA from exogenous transcripts or are chopped from single strand endogenous transcripts. You can also define these two classes functionally - siRNA resulting in the formation of a siRISC or RITS complex, miRNA resulting in the miRISC complex. The siRISC and miRISC having two distinct fates (see fig). In some ways the functional definition is more useful.
Here is a question. How many miRNAs are thought to have 100% complementary to their targets? Or I guess the better question is how many targets have 100% complement to their miRNA? (I'm not up on that latest figures)
My impression from my readings was also that the distinction is based on the biogenesis, and not the function. As for figures about perfect matches of miRNA targets, I don't know them either, but as far as I remember it is ALWAYS the case in plants (and yet they are called miRNAs, and not siRNAs).
And what about piRNAs? We will soon run out of short lowercase combinations for the amazing RNA bestiary. Recently I was trying to name a class of small RNAs in a theory I was working on, and each time I came to some nice idea of the form "xxRNA", Google showed me that someone had already used it.
i don't know the figures either, but its an interesting question so i might spend some time this afternoon looking..
re: names of new RNA-types.. if someone could get the clout to alter the nomenclature to things that are less clumsy to pronounce i think we would be better off.. casually, in discussions i have referred to them as "S.I.'s" and what not, but that's gonna get clumsy again for "r.a.s.i. and t.a.s.is".. it'd be nice if people could take a sec to try to shorten their descriptive abbreviation.. maybe pronounce those like "raisy and taisy"..
I beleive the structure is a big player. miRNA contain the hairpin or stem loop, whereas siRNAs are short double stranded RNAs with a 2 nt 3'overhang on either end, with a 5'p and 3'oh group