Guest Blog by Diane Bock
The Age of Enlightenment is associated with intellectual exchange, reason and sharing of the new ideas. We think of names like Isaac newton, Thomas Jefferson and John Locke. Could this new way of thinking also be connected with coffee?
During this period the coffee house emerged as a social center. People from all walks of life mixed and mingled and pollinated each others' ideas. They also started consuming buckets of coffee while moving away from swilling beer morning, noon and night. Prior to that, beer was the safest beverage due to the pollution levels of water. Hence, large numbers of citizens were semi-intoxicated a lot of the time.
But once coffee became available, the tipsy were replaced by the wired. The dulling effects of alcohol gave way to the stimulation of caffeine. Imagine Ben Franklin and his cronies yacking it up in a London coffeehouse or Voltaire chit chatting with other deep thinkers from the worlds of science, religion, politics and economics, each sipping that era's equivalent of a latte or cappuccino. No wonder the world saw a boost in innovation.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Tom Levenson is a professor, a teacher of journalism and science journalism, and an Einstein scholar. He also knows a thing or two about Isaac Newton.
One of my favorite non fiction books of all time is Newton and the Counterfeiter: The Unknown Detective Career of the World's Greatest Scientist…
On the one hand, it's kind of sad that early 21st-century society is in need of frequent reminders of just how important reason is. Israelis and Lebanese are slaughtering each other. Iraq is in the midst of what can best be described as a civil war. American politics is dominated by those who…
Two recent developments that I think are connected in a strange way.
Starbucks just came out with a new drink size, the Trenta, where the volume of coffee is bigger than the human stomach. Wow, that's a lot of caffeine.
In the same vein, there a company out there that's come up with a 12 oz "…
Mark Olson has written a response to my reply to his post on the meaning of the word 'liberty' in the Declaration of Independence. Unfortunately, I don't think he has mitigated any of the logical difficulties with the original post. He begins:
First, I didn't look at the corpus of writings of those…