Number of World Hungry Drops, then Rises Again 20 Minutes Later

Ok, that's not quite the headline at the New York Times, but close enough. Yes, the latest Oxfam figures that came out today say that we're back under 1 billion starving people. But yes, those figures were compiled before the Pakistani Floods, and before the 5% rise in food prices driven by the Russian wheat crisis.

The number of hungry people fell to 925 million from its all-time high of 1.02 billion in 2009, with much of the improvement tied to income growth in the Asia-Pacific region as well as a 40 percent decline in food prices from their 2008 peak.

The hunger number remains "shockingly high," Josette Sheeren , the executive director of the World Food Program, told a news conference in Rome, especially since success stories in Africa, Asia and Latin America among countries that once suffered chronic malnourishment point the way to creating a permanent reversal.

Actually, the success stories in Africa, Asia and Latin America that emerged during the comparatively wealthy and stable period of the mid-aughts probably don't point a way to much of anything. At least the Times does point out that the promises that world nations have made for investment in agriculture in the Global South have not been met - remember those from the days of the food crisis? The 20 richest nations promised 22 billion, but have only ponied up 425 million between them. But who is counting?

What's really important to note here is that food security is so vulnerable that comparatively small shifts, like the Russian situation can destabilize things *even* when we have record harvests. Given the coming likely constraints of climate change and energy investment, we're likely to see a great deal more instability.

The UN isn't using the term "food crisis" this time - just warning that the situation could become a crisis. That, however, is more a feature of our desire to see problems as over before they really are. Just as many economists continue to insist that the recession ended and now we're facing a "second dip" - even though a more accurate overall picture suggests that there never was any recovery - we like to pretend that the food crisis went away. Unfortunately, it didn't.


More like this

Some villages in Pakistan's Sindh province are still underwater following August's floods, and a new UNICEF survey has found that nearly one-fourth of the children under five there are malnourished. The deputy head of UNICEF Pakistan, Karen Allen, calls conditions "shockingly bad" and compares them…
If you want to see it in color, all you have to do is google image up a history of the price of oil and superimpose it on the price of various staple crops. Take a look at oil and then rice, soybeans, wheat and corn. Look closely at 2008, and at the present. I will put up a visual presentation…
Shockingly (or not so much, if you read here regularly), despite the supposed improvements in the economy, more and more American families are struggling to put meals on the table.  The USDA reports a record 46.7 million American households are on food stamps.  17.9 % of American households (up 700…
We now all know the limitations of Standard and Poor, what they missed and what they didn't, why to blame Republicans, why to blame Obama, and that Austerity is the new watchword in the US, while rioting has taken everyone's imagination in the UK (wow, aren't we timely?) Most of us are worried…

Yippeee Skippeee! Now it's only 900,000,000!!! Thank goodness, and the Harvard MBA's!! Now I can sleep again at night.

@Greenpa - Such a cynic, tch, tch. Life has been so full of disappointments that you just can't accept real progress when you see it. ;-) But that's O.K. If they took a count right now - at this minute - it would be back up over 1.0 billion and rising.