Official word out of DC - associate administrator for the Science Directorate, Dr Mary Cleave is retiring in spring 2007.
This implies possible significant policy changes for space science next year, including changes in funding priorities, particularly for the smaller niche missions and sub-fields.
Keep a sharp eye out for who the replacement will be. It may matter a lot.
NASA also has ads out for new Astrophysics and Planetary Science Division Heads. Same applies there.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I haven't spent much time in that den of iniquity, DC, lately
but... third hand rumours percolate back to me, and if I can't sleep, neither should you
a few weeks ago, a commenter said something to the effect that "NASA would do nothing until JWST was out of the way" - I thought at the time it was…
Via NASAwatch - NASA administrator Griffin replies to the American Astronomical Societies' Six Questions On NASA Priorities and Processes
Read it.
Interesting, tempered, with interesting conceptual holes.
1) the "mission balance" is not just different size missions, it is also different sub-fields…
I heard it from a man who,
heard it from a man who,
heard it from another...
ok, it was an e-mail, but it confirmed the strange tale I had been told.
NASA is about to do a Mad Max on its Science Missions.
Five missions enter, one mission leaves. Literally.
NASA has many houses. Within one is the…
It was NASA proposal season last month, meant to comment on it, but was so exhausted and pissed off about the whole thing that I needed some space.
A typical proposals is 15 pages of main text; including biblio, bios, associated documents and blurbs the final (electronic) package is typically 40-55…
I saw the advert for the Astrophysics Division Head, but had not heard about Mary Cleave.
I used to think a random change would be likely to be for the good; not so sure anymore. Still, at least I can imagine potentially good things. A nice fantasy until reality kicks in.