string theology

I was discussing the "Landscape" in string theory, as it relates to modern cosmology in class, and the students first reaction was: "what is all the fuss about"?
It seemed a bit mystifying to them that the community was having such angst over the issue.

So... I was trying to explain the metaphysical and philosophical angles, and why it got people agitated, and made the natural, if potentially ill-advised, comparison with religion.

This was one of these issues, said I, which seem terribly important at the time to the participants, but, no doubt, will seem all very silly in the future, much as we now think that some issues people fought over hundreds of years ago now seem silly.
Like... ah, like what?

I was going to say "like the thirty years was", but maybe suggesting catholic/protestant schisms were silly might offend a some in the audience.
My brain went into overdrive, I ran through some of the obvious options very fast:
shia vs sunni? No!
trinity vs unitarianism? Better not go there...
manichaean dualism? Noooo....
gnosticism... Nah, remember the Albigensian crusade!
Arianism? Nestorianism?
This was not going to work.

And then I got it: Freyja or Frigg?
Which is the One True Goddess of Fertility and Love.

This is serious stuff, I felt like getting my axe and charging, with a roar!
Who, after all, could deny the beauty and divinity of Freyja?
Friggin' Friggian Heretics!

But, the students understood.
And I explained about the Landscape and the concept of realization of all possible physics vs the possibility of the one true theory, and then we discussed anthropism a little bit.
Calmly.
While I showed pictures of E8.

PS: Of course everyone knows that cats are sacred to Freyja?



From Le Maison Forte - Freyja: the goddess with the gib cats

Tags

More like this

A reader asks: I often hear the Sunni/Shia conflict analogized to the Catholic/Protestant conflict, esp as manifested in Northern Ireland. Would you say this is valid or not? Why? I honestly don't understand these intramural conflicts very well, so this is a genuine request for clarification. This…
Recent discoveries by my friend Lars got me thinking about New Age archaeology. The Mid-summer hippie/druid vs. police battles for Stonehenge are legendary. A few years ago I was given a guided tour of the Salisbury Plain's finest sites by my charming scholar friend Rebecca Montague. Entering the…
Tonight on Thursday Night Wrestling: SteelyKid versus Sky Bison! Roar! Roar! ROAR! SteelyKid wins! (Apologies to Bob Shea of Dinosaur vs. Bedtime...) Special bonus roaring: Bob Shea on YouTube:
The blogosphere is a-twitter over surfer dude paper modestly titled An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything by Garrett Lisi Just maybe he is onto something, but it is way overhyped And so it is. Lisi's homepage (currently severly slashdotted) and wiki There is extensive discussion at…

Now if only you could tie string theory to the dynamics of cats, you'd have it made, right?!

10^1000 solutions with no testable predictions are not immune to empirical falsification! Perturbative string theory requires BRST invariance to unify the effects of a massive body (gravitation) and an accelerated coordinate frame (inertia). Find two lumps that vacuum free fall differently and string theory is dead.

400+ years have been spent looking for two such lumps for various reasons. An Eotvos experiment is the gold standard. Only one contrast remains unobserved and undecided:

Do chemically identical enantiomorphic mass distributions vacuum free fall identically? Teleparallel gravitation with Weitzenboeck spacetime (spacetime torsion not curvature) says "no."

A parity Eotvos experiment opposing enantiomorphic space groups P3(1)21 and P3(2)21 alpha-quartz single crystal test masses is the only possible Equivalence Principle violation remaining. Somebody should look - and kill string theory really most sincerely dead.