ouch
Daily Show takes on ASU Commencement
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | M - Th 11p / 10c | |||
Arizona State Snubs Obama | ||||
|
classic
cruel but classic
Tom Hanks interview on antimatter later in the show is also good
Yes, CERN had some
Yes, they dropped it
Boom
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I'm a little surprised that I haven't seen bloggers commenting on Tom Hanks's appearance on The Daily Show, in which he talks about CERN:
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart
M - Th 11p / 10c
Tom Hanks
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes
Economic Crisis
Political Humor…
This is very funny (as you might expect). Chad Orzel posted it because of the references to CERN's super duper collider. (Go see Chad's commentary.)
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart
M - Th 11p / 10c
Tom Hanks
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes
Economic Crisis
Political Humor…
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart
M - Th 11p / 10c
Tom Hanks
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes
Economic Crisis
Political Humor
Blockbuster movies, The Daily Show: As I discuss in forthcoming articles, these are the new tools for "going broad" and motivating interest among…
Elizabeth Warren on the Daily Show
I think she was about to curse...
ok, so this was some time ago, I'm behind
question is, why don't prime time news shows do interviews like this?
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart
M - Th 11p / 10c
Elizabeth Warren Pt. 1
thedailyshow.com
Daily Show…
Cheap hatchet job that could have been done with any student body, even that at Penn State.
Where were the interviews with the National Merit Scholars (we have more than any other public)? The students in the Barrett Honors College (one of the best honors college in the country and easily the equal of Schreyer at PSU)? The recent round of successful Fulbright and Boren/NSEP applicants (we have more - if I remember correctly - that any other public)? I could go on.
Instead we have picture of partying students that could be taken in any frat house anywhere in the country, and interviews with vacuous students (that occur everywhere, even PSU).
Obama's not getting an honorary degree, get over it. Then again, he's also not speaking at PSU anytime soon.
Funny, I heard him speak at PSU in person last year.
Good speaker.
ASU screwed up. Then they dug themselves in deeper.
You're not helping the cause.
PS: faculty, current students and ex-students of ASU include some of my dearest friends; including several ex-PSU students;
and I could and would cheerfully point the Daily Show to any of thousands of vacuous students to interview at PSU... but
Attacking other universities does not ameliorate the stupidity of the ASU's president's office and their PR people.
We all do stupid in our own special ways.
The segment mentions former Canadian PM Kim Campbell, who did get an honorary degree from ASU despite being Prime Minister for only four months. A Google search turned up this bio of her, which states that not only was her party defeated in the October 1993 elections, but she lost her own seat. That's a very big deal in a parliamentary system, since being an MP is a prerequisite for becoming Prime Minister--you generally want your party leaders to represent safe constituencies. The closest equivalent in recent US history would be then-Speaker Tom Foley (D-WA) losing his seat in the 1994 Congressional election, but Foley was only Speaker of the House, not President. I don't see the argument for giving an honorary degree to Campbell and not Obama, unless you believe (foolishly, IMO) that party affiliation (Campbell was a Progressive Conservative, Obama is a Democrat) makes a difference.
Steinn is definitely right. ASU screwed up, and when they opened their mouth about it they inserted the foot even deeper.
While it's generally true about party leaders representing safe constituencies in parliamentary systems an interesting aside is that in most cases there isn't any explicit law that forbids members of the upper house - who are often not directly elected - to be the PM. This isn't common or encouraged. But members of the House of Lords have been British PMs in the (distant) past. The current Indian PM is also from the upper house (first to do so if I recall correctly). And ~400 million voters just appear to have approved of th.