Yay, NASA Senior Review is out:
tl;dr - everyone is above average, they're good enough and we like you.
Mission ranks
bad news: per AAAC meeting earlier, there is not enough $ to actually pay for all these lovely toys, so something will have to give, somewhere.
Someone at a high enough pay grade to take the blame will decide whether to cut from the bottom or give everybody a haircut.
Early tealeaf readings are haircuts all around.
More like this
[Editor's Note: After extensive review by our attorneys, upper management at T. C. O. Enterprises, Inc. has determined that the copy provided by the narrator for today's subject is too controversial to print.
Lets say you are a super hero. You are in cognito at this huge fancy party the Mayor is throwing, and you get word that one of the party guests is really a mad scientist/evil genius whos about to do something really mad/evil.
I will have you know that I never experienced the red pattern in the diagram.
A list:
Genetically Modified Foods
Liquor
Breast Implants
Rosie O'Donnell on The View
Pesticides
1986's Flow-bee Haircut before the Junior Prom with Wendy Barnes
World War I
--Ng&Cohen2006
My take of the senior review website is that the official NASA response authorizes all missions for extensions; those decisions do indeed take into account the budget. The response notes which missions have had additions or reductions to their budgets. So no missions will be turned off.