Thank you!

i-5e4f626a7e8c12a48bc3b28ba0e7d8a2-Evolving God.jpgOne of the perks of being a scienceblogger is a steady stream of offers of preview copies of books, as well as willingness of publishers to send one if asked. I have a huge stack of them - some read, some halfway, some waiting for a better future. I've reviewed some of them already. Sooner or later I will read them and review them all.

Recently, I complained that I had trouble getting a copy of Evolving God: A Provocative View on the Origins of Religion by Barbara J. King. Doubleday does not use e-mail! Their parent-company Random House explicitely refuses to use email for communication. Cut the trees! Full speed to the 19th century!

But then, one of my readers came to the rescue, checked out my amazon wish list and got me the book! Nothing makes me happier! The book should be in my mailbox any day now.

Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tags

More like this

I have read "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins and "Breaking The Spell" by Daniel Dennett a couple of months ago, could not bear to slog all the way through "The End of Faith" by Sam Harris, and am still waiting to get my copies of "God: the Failed Hypothesis" by Victor Stenger and "Evolving God…
'cept these folks: Slate, on Janet Browne's new edition of Origin and on Darwin as a writer. Jonah's digging it too; and so is fellow Virginian Jason. The Economist on the globalizing trend of evolution-creationism debates The Chronicle of Higher Education dishes up an essay that discusses these…
David Barash tries to review 11 recent books on the religion/science conflict, all in one essay of middling length. It's not entirely satisfying, nor could it be with that excess of books in so little space, but it does have a convenient short list of what's been published lately. Breaking the…
OK, this is not a re-post of one old post, but three. The first one, from December 17, 2005, introduces Institutionalized. The second one, from January 20, 2006, adds some more info about the book. Finally, the third one, from May 17, 2006, gives a paragraph-long review of the book within a…

But your post says "Doubleday does not use e-mail! Their parent-company Random House explicitely refuses to use email for communication." It doesn't say "Doubleday does not use e-mail for requesting preview copies! Their parent-company Random House explicitely refuses to use email for requesting preview copies."

Also, according to Random House's web site, they won't use email for "publishing dates of forthcoming titles; author contact information; review or forward unsolicited manuscripts or proposals" - I see nothing about requesting preview copies here.