At least Edwards refuses to participate. Let's hope that all the other candidates also decide to refuse to participate in that charade.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I always try to watch debates by erasing all of my prior information, just like a "virgin" voter, seeing the candidates for the first time. And with such a mindset, I have to say I was proud to be a Democrat last night! There were three formidable people up on the stage, obviously intelligent,…
This just in: John Edwards has officially endorsed Barack Obama for president. It's a little late (since Obama has had the nomination all but wrapped up for a couple of months now), and I'm not sure what kind of an impact this will have, but I still find this exciting.
Although I've been an Obama…
PBS's News Hour with Jim Lehrer has just done a wonderful online story about how Science Debate 2008 originally came about, and how far it has come since those early days. Reporter Jenny Marder didn't miss a point that I myself have been making in talks like this one--namely that if it weren't for…
In a major victory for Democratic netroots activists, the Nevada Democratic Party has reportedly pulled out of the August Democratic Presidential debate that they were co-sponsoring with the Fox "News" Channel. The move comes after extensive pressure from a wide range of activist groups, after…
Maybe its because Fox News has more regular viewers than MSNBC and CNN combined?
CNN and NMSNBC are only marginally better - they are all shills for the GOP, just that Fox is much more blatant about it. And why are Fox ratings tanking over the past year or so compared to the others? Why is O'Reilly falling while Olberman rising month after month? Is it because people are finally waking up and realizing they've been duped?
I say - one debate: PBS only.
There is talk of an e-debate, streamed on various web sites only.
Yup. I heard of that - tree or four different online entities jockeying for position to get it - why not have them all host one. Why not 3-4 e-debates?
So.... In your world, who *isn't* a chill for the GOP? I mean, CNN (the station founded by a guy who gave billions to the UN and liberal causes) is called a Liberal shill by Republicans, and you call it a GOP shill. Which is it?
And as for the edebate - if it happens it will be an unmitigated disaster in the greater election. While there are more and more homes with internet access, even broadband, use online political wonks are a thin crowd. You think CNN, ABC, or the New York Times is going to give *favorable* reviews to an edebate when there will be a vast majority of Americans who didn't see it and it is an encroachment on their cash flow? Not gonna' happen. The MSM will, at best, spin it for their preferred candidates and, at worse, use it to make Democrats look elitist.
I agree, Coturnix. Fox News is absurdly, comically, outrageously biased. And, no, CNN is not a liberal shill. They haved been trying to position themselves as Fox Junior because of the success of blatantly-conservative "news" media. Unfortunately for all of them, it's getting harder and harder to put a positive spin on the doings of the republican party. Did you see the news crawl on Fox saying that Scooter Libby had been acquited of lying to the FBI? That's sure the lede, given his conviction on the other charges and the potential 25-year sentence for those convictions.
I assume that Barack Obama wouldn't be planning to participate in a FauxNews hosted event either, so the candidates participating would be kind of restricted. Hillary, perhaps, since she's taken Faux money.