Michael Pollan on the Farm Bill

It is Sunday. You have time to read it. And you should - no excuses! In today's New York Times - You Are What You Grow:
---------------------------

For the answer, you need look no farther than the farm bill. This resolutely unglamorous and head-hurtingly complicated piece of legislation, which comes around roughly every five years and is about to do so again, sets the rules for the American food system -- indeed, to a considerable extent, for the world's food system. Among other things, it determines which crops will be subsidized and which will not, and in the case of the carrot and the Twinkie, the farm bill as currently written offers a lot more support to the cake than to the root.

---------------------------

To speak of the farm bill's influence on the American food system does not begin to describe its full impact -- on the environment, on global poverty, even on immigration. By making it possible for American farmers to sell their crops abroad for considerably less than it costs to grow them, the farm bill helps determine the price of corn in Mexico and the price of cotton in Nigeria and therefore whether farmers in those places will survive or be forced off the land, to migrate to the cities -- or to the United States. The flow of immigrants north from Mexico since Nafta is inextricably linked to the flow of American corn in the opposite direction, a flood of subsidized grain that the Mexican government estimates has thrown two million Mexican farmers and other agricultural workers off the land since the mid-90s. (More recently, the ethanol boom has led to a spike in corn prices that has left that country reeling from soaring tortilla prices; linking its corn economy to ours has been an unalloyed disaster for Mexico's eaters as well as its farmers.) You can't fully comprehend the pressures driving immigration without comprehending what U.S. agricultural policy is doing to rural agriculture in Mexico.

---------------------------
Read the whole thing....

Tags

More like this

Michael Pollan makes so much sense it's actually a little painful, since such basic agricultural reforms will never, ever get through Congress. At some point in the twentieth century, American lawmakers forgot that the sole goal of farming wasn't efficiency; high-fructose corn syrup should not be…
My mother in law ate a roasted turnip at my house the other day. It was unfamiliar enough to her in that form (she'd had mashed turnips before) that she had to ask me what it was, and it was a reminder of the fact that this time of year truly is the only time that many Americans come in contact…
Major public health organizations are drawing attention to climate changeâs effects on health: the American Public Health Association has chosen âClimate Change: Our Health in the Balanceâ as the theme for National Public Health Week (April 7-13), and the World Health Organization used World Health…
Agricultural subsidies are bad policy on so many different levels. They artificially lower food prices, thus making it harder for farmers from developing nations to compete. (Cutting subsidies would do a tremendous amount of good for the third world.) They encourage the growth of monoculture…

But Mexican farmers have no vote on the farm bill. Farm state reps will vote for the short term interests of their constituents, the global picture be damned.

Interesting connection you have made about immigration and NAFTA. I understand where you are coming from but I think you must also realize that as the US becomes more and more of a service industry and our population becomes more and more professional, we need people to fill the spots of unskilled jobs (farm hands, hotel maids, janitors, etc). These spots are likely filled by immigrants, and I might add, they are earning much higher wages even with increases in living expenses, than if they were still in Mexico.

This summer I am interning for a biotech lobbying firm in DC, I came across your blog while searching for news on the farm bill (I will be attending many, shall we say entertaining, congressional hearings on this topic). What are your ideas on subsidizing farmers? Do you think that it creates more of a social welfare problem or a benefit to our society? Also, in reference to organics and the increased profits they receive above those who are not organic, do you think they should be paid for any contamination from biotech crops? Just some thoughts