Another fox hiding from atheists in a hole?

Barry Saunders is a local columnist for Raleigh News & Observer who I never thought was very funny (there is a mysoginist streak in his writing) so I rarely read him these days. But the other day I could not help but notice that he started his column with the old "no atheists in foxholes" stupidity - in context of the VT massacre, of course.

I was far too busy these last couple of days to do anything about it myself, feeling confident that he was gonna hear about it from many others. And, sure he did. Just like Katie Couric, Tom Brokaw, Bob Schieffer and John Burnett (the latter two publically apologized), he got inundated by mail. But unlike the others, he refuses to see how insulting the phrase is and instead calls the atheists "anal" and thinks he's funny. Just digging himself deeper.

You can read my old take on the phrase here. Perhaps Saunders needs another loadful of e-mails to set him straight....(barry.saunders@newsobserver.com)

More like this

Oh yes there are atheists in Foxholes! In the latest Newsweek: There are no atheists in foxholes," the old saw goes. The line, attributed to a WWII chaplain, has since been uttered countless times by grunts, chaplains and news anchors. But an increasingly vocal group of activists and soldiers--…
Yesterday I listened to a segment on All Things Considered called Atheist Brigade Takes Arguments to the Tolerant (podcast) with some trepidation. But, when it all ended, I thought it was not bad at all. Apart from a couple of intolerant sentences in the beginning by someone named Wolf (if I…
I rarely watch TV, and probably the last time I was a regular viewer of any evening news program was in graduate school, pre-kids. However, I've peripherally followed the Katie Couric drama, her move from the Today show to CBS Evening News, and her subsequent disappointing ratings. I've had a…
Yesterday I asked the rhetorical question, would Dembski continue to embarrass himself in this situation regarding Shallit's testimony? Well, we have our answer. Not only is he continuing to embarrass himself, he's digging the hole even deeper. He's now compounding his dishonesty with an attempt to…

Maybe he'd be offended at some toss-off line about how Hell is full of Christians?

No atheists in the foxhole?

Wrong. Under attack, the injured and the terrified do cry out.

Number 1 is "Medic!"

Number 2 is "Mommy!"

Number 3 is unprintable in polite company.

Way down the list are Mother Mary and those of that ilk.

By Vorpal Blade (not verified) on 24 Apr 2007 #permalink

Thanks for picking up this story. At MAAF, we followed up with the first story right away. Although he still has a certain style -- he stated sarcastically that he might be called "Mr. Sensitivity" -- the substance of the second article is something I can support.

First, he admits that he used the 'no atheists' comment without thinking. He continues that he doesn't know what the big deal is, but he recognizes that he sees that it is a big deal to us atheists. Moreover, he says that he'd vote for us and he appreciates our service.

Sure, he called us 'anal', but I think that's his style. Also, to be fair, we atheists are skeptical, rational, logical, focused on details, and although 'anal' is a negative word, I think I'll take it as a compliment.

We atheists have a lot to be outraged about, or at least annoyed about. I think we should take the opportunity to send thanks for Barry's second article. He addressed the issue and said a number of positive things as well.

Jason
MAAF

I always prefer to turn that phrase around anyway. Sure there are no atheists in foxholes. We're out there charging the enemy positions while the religious hide in the foxholes and pray to their sky-daddy for salvation :-)

Note - Please, please, please don't flip this into yet another scenario where the PZ/Dawkins/Harris-style atheists charge the front lines while the Chamberlain atheists dodge the bullets. Oops, too late!