Attila (read the entire transcript of our chat) alerted me to a new book review of 'The Open Science 2006' science blogging anthology.
MC and Reed have already blogged about the review.
Let me know what you think. And keep the submissions for the 2007 edition flowing in.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The day before yesterday, my copy of The Open Laboratory 2007, the second annual science blogging anthology, arrived in the mail.
So yesterday, Reed and I met at a coffee shop and looked it over. It looks great! Reed knows what he's doing and is a perfectionist, so of course the book looks…
2008 Science Blogging Conference
Not to be bragging, but the '07 Science Blogging Conference was a great success, and most attendees voiced their approval of Chapel Hill as a permanent venue for the event, so Anton and I are starting early in planning for the next one.
There are rumors of a mid-…
Now that the registration for the Science Blogging Conference is open, it is time to remind you that the new edition of the Science Blogging Anthology, "Open Laboratory 2007", is in the works and is accepting your suggestions.
Although the entire process, from the initial idea all the way to…
Editing the 2006 anthology of the best writing on science blogs was a fast, whirlwind affair - with a little help from my friends, I put it together (yes, from idea to having the book up for sale) in less than a month. As it was quite a success and I expected the number of entries to double (I was…
So how are the submissions coming Bora? Can we see them?
We got 38 entries from 28 blogs so far. I don't think they are publicly visible at this point. Should they be?
Probably not. Keeping the contents secret could boost sales when it's published.
The book reviewer is very flattering when he says I taught him a lot about mitochondria...except for the fact that I was writing about the eye.
(Kind of undercuts the complaint about poor editing in blogs, don't you think?)