A cellular riddle

It takes 38 minutes for the E.coli genome to replicate. Yet, E.coli can bo coaxed to divide in a much shorter time: 20 minutes. How is this possible?

Larry poses the riddle and provides the solution.

The key is that complex biochemical processes are taught sequentially, one by one, because that is how we think and process information. Yet, unless there is a need for precise timing (in which case there will be a timer triggering the starts and ends of cellular events), most processes occur all the time, simultaneously, in parallel. How do we teach that?

More like this

One of the problems with many of the interesting graph algorithms is that they're complex. As graphs get large, computations over them can become extremely slow. For example, graph coloring is NP-complete - so the time to run a true optimal graph coloring algorithm on an arbitrary graph grows…
Every so often, a creationist will start babbling about "information theory", and thereby defaming a perfectly legitimate line of research. While I'm at the airport, waiting for my flight back from ASM2011, here's something from the archives, "Creationists, "Biological Information", and Cyber-…
When it comes to evolution, a species' past has a massive bearing on what it might become. That's the latest message from a 20-year-long experiment in evolution, which shows how small twists of fate can take organisms down very different evolutionary paths. The role of history in evolution is a…
In response to us foul-mouthed evolutionists, Casey Luskin asks, "Yet for all their numbers and name-calling, not a single one has answered Egnor's question: How does [sic] Darwinian mechanisms produce new biological information?" I've never liked the whole "biological information" concept. As far…

Been there, done that. It is called "Fast Tracking". This means taking a stepwise process which should have the steps done in sequence, and doing all the steps similtaneously, rather than in sequence. The basic assumption is that all the steps will actually work.

By Jim Thomerson (not verified) on 11 May 2008 #permalink

A dozen or so years ago when I was taking the required biochemistry/molecular biology course in grad school, I drove the instructor nuts with my questions. She would give us all the players, all the enzymes, all the pathways, and even some of the ins/outs of energetics of the process. Then I'd ask how long it takes, is it in milliseconds, seconds, minutes or hours, how many molecules go through it at any given time, etc. In some rare cases she even knew or could guess at the answers. I am wondering if these days such questions are taken more seriously and if people study the dynamics more than they used to, or if the teaching is still limited to identifying the players and the sequence of events in a pathway.