How to get scientists to adopt web 2.0 technologies - Obligatory Reading of the Day

Eva Amsen: How to get scientists to adopt web 2.0 technologies:

Many, if not most, scientists are not in the habit of putting things online. The ones that are might be tempted by the concept of sharing the papers they read, letting everyone look at their lab notebook, joining a forum or writing a blog. If you're reading this in your RSS feed or clicked through from FriendFeed, you're probably one of those people. But think about your friends and colleagues who only turn on their computer for work and e-mail. They're not going to tag their favourite papers or discuss the process of research with total strangers on the internet. It's an extra thing to do that's not already part of their lives, and no matter how appealing they might find the concept of open data or sharing information, they won't join these sites or movements because it's not something they are already doing.

So what are they already doing?

See also discussions on FriendFeed about this insightful article.

What do you think?

More like this

During my summer blogging break, I thought I'd repost of few of my "greatest hits" from my old blog, just so you all wouldn't miss me so much. This one is from September 3, 2008. There was some nice discussion on Friendfeed that's worth checking out. ===== Some recent posts that got me thinking…
The series of interviews with some of the participants of the 2008 Science Blogging Conference was quite popular, so I decided to do the same thing again this year, posting interviews with some of the people who attended ScienceOnline'09 back in January. Today, I asked Eva Amsen, a participant at…
I have a whole pile of science-y book reviews on two of my older blogs, here and here. Both of those blogs have now been largely superseded by or merged into this one. So I'm going to be slowly moving the relevant reviews over here. I'll mostly be doing the posts one or two per weekend and I'll…
Best time to appreciate Open Access? When you're really sick and want to learn more about what you have.: * Complete OA still a long way off. One thing I re-learned during this was that it is incredibly frustrating to see how much of the biomedical literature is still not freely available…

Well i think scientist depend more on their post doc and PhD students, who in turn use text mining tools, NLP engines, to mine and track publication and research. When it comes to sharing most of these students are more familiar with web 2.0 sites and tagging sites.

But here is some thing i came across recently it is as easy as composing and checking your mails on Gmail or Yahoo. I think now scientist can try and use it all by themselves with out the help of their students.

Track publications of their interest
stare and collaborate

This is one cool stuff, if you are interested in reading manually annotated sentences and facts for any abstract of your interest- then you must try this service Xtractor its absolutely free - http://www.xtractor.in

some really interesting features too:
maps the extracted entities (genes, processes, drugs, diseases etc) to multiple ontologies. check out the facility to Share and collaborate.

Hi Kamesh,

XTractor is just fantastic; iam a registered user and I feel nobody has every tried out this concept of giving out manually curated data for free to the users. I was having a tough time shortlisting literature from PUBMED for my list of proteins, now XTractor keeps me posted regularly for free. And the collaboration features are just too good.

thanks again!!!!