1. clock
  2. Open Access in the developing world - yes, it is a Good.Thing.

Open Access in the developing world - yes, it is a Good.Thing.

By clock on March 2, 2009.

A few days back a paper came out (not OA, sorry), with a keen grasp of the obvious: Open Access is useful for those living in countries where they do not have much access. Duh! Furthermore, those who barely do any science at all, i.e., in the least developed countries, don't cite, so there is no difference between OA and TA there. And yet more, their methodology was fraught with errors galore. I am happy to report that this paper was debunked by several people already - so check them out:

Evans and Reimer greatly underestimate effect of free access

Research highlights from Dr. Obvious: Tracking the citation advantage of open-access publication in the developing world

A Global Perspective On The Open Access Effect

The Evans & Reimer OA Impact Study: A Welter of Misunderstandings

Perils of Press-Release Journalism: NSF, U. Chicago, and Chronicle of Higher Education

Especially those last two by Stevan Harnad are thorough and detailed. Don't believe something just because it has been published!

Also a discussion here.

Tags
open science

More like this

The reverse-AOL maneuver and possible futures for serials
Back in the day, Time Warner merged with AOL. It turned out to be one of the worst merger ideas in the history of merger ideas, and I believe the evidence suggests that most mergers actually turn out to be clunkers! AOL was simply at the top of its orbit, nowhere but downhill to go. I wonder, I do…
On the Nature of PLoS....
I know that you know that I work for PLoS. So, I know that a lot of you are waiting for me to respond, in some way, to the hatchet-job article by Declan Bucler published in Nature yesterday. Yes, Nature and PLoS are competitors in some sense of the word (though most individual people employed by…
Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship. Really?
Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship by James A. Evans, ironically behind the paywall, has got a lot of people scratching their heads - it sounds so counter-intuitive, as well as opposite from other pieces of similar research. There is a good discussion on…
OASPA: act now or lose credibility forever
So the backstory of the truly horrific murders at the University of Alabama at Huntsville has taken an open-access turn: the perpetrator (not being a journalist, I don't think I need to say "alleged") got a rather dubious-looking article published in an open-access journal. Further investigation…