Life after Darwin: Are there still big discoveries to be made in biology?

From SCONC:

Tuesday, March 31

6:30 p.m.

"Life after Darwin: Are there still big discoveries to be made in biology?" NC State ecologist Rob Dunn continues the NC Museum of Natural Science's Charles Darwin Lecture Series. Free lecture; doors open at 6. Museum of Natural Science, downtown Raleigh. Please RSVP to museum.reservations@ncmail.net.

(Next in the series: Anne Yoder, director of the Duke Lemur Center, and paleontologist Paul Brinkman on Darwin's use of fossil evidence.)

More like this

DARWIN LECTURE SERIES CONTINUES! How did we come to be here? Answers to this question have preoccupied humans for millennia. Scientists have sought clues in the genes of living things, in the physical environments of Earth - from mountaintops to the depths of the ocean, in the chemistry of this…
The North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences hosts the final offering of its Charles Darwin Lecture Series on Tuesday, November 24 -- the 150th anniversary of Darwin's landmark publication of "The Origin of Species." Join Museum paleontologist and science historian Paul Brinkman for a free…
As you may remember, this week we have a special guest here in the Triangle - Carl Zimmer is coming to enjoy NC BBQ and, since he's already here on the 12th, to give the Darwin Day talk at the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences in Raleigh (directions): "Darwin and Beyond: How Evolution Is…
I get e-mails about such events, so I thought I'd share, so you can attend some of these talks if you want: NCSE's executive director Eugenie C. Scott will be speaking twice in North Carolina shortly. First, at 7:00 p.m. on January 27, she will be speaking on "Darwin's Legacy in Science and Society…

Wish I could be there: it's a question I've been thinking about lately. The answer is - who knows? New vistas tend to open up when and where we least expect.

By cromercrox (not verified) on 16 Mar 2009 #permalink

There are many big discoveries left. At least some of them can only be appreciated after rejecting ideas that are currently accepted but which are completely wrong. One of the biggest wrong ideas is the idea of homeostasis. A completely wrong idea that is completely unsupported by data. It is a completely non-physiologic idea. A step up from vitalism, but only a small step.

http://daedalus2u.blogspot.com/2008/01/myth-of-homeostasis-implications…

What in physiology is constant or static? Absolutely nothing. If a physiological parameter is used as a control signal, it can't be static because then it would be unable to signal anything by changing. If any parameter is controlled by the concentration of a substance (even if it is only the concentration of the substance itself), the concentration of that substance can't be held constant.