David Glenn's article get discussed by Henry Farrell (lots of comments there), Ted Frank and King.
Lott finally mentions the lawsuit on his blog. No comments there, so far.
More like this
The ResMed Foundation and the Farrell Family Foundation, which served as key Sponsors for the inaugural Festival last year and for the original San Diego Science Festival(SM) (organized by the Science Spark team) in 2009, is continuing its support by signing on as a Sponsor for the 2nd
John Farrell has been helping to keep an eye out for outlandish claims made by Tom Bethell, author of the Politically Incorrect Guide to Science.
You may recall the case of geneticist Robert Farrell, who had been initially charged with bioterroism for sharing generally-harmless strains of bacteria with a colleague, SUNY-Buffalo art professor Steven K
How will we ever recover from this discovery of a profound inconsistency in evolutionary theory?
There's a good reason you won't find comments at Lott's blog... they are strictly filtered for anything that contradicts Lott.
This selective filtering of blog comments is little more than an end-run around the criticism of sock puppets. The sock puppet's purpose is to give the appearance that the "community" supports the blogger. The same thing is accomplished by selecting which posts to publish and which to trash. If the blogger throws out reasoned criticism, the blogger creates the false impression that everyone supports his argument except the slow-witted.
Lott hasn't created a place for "comments," he's created an echo chamber.
Lott is obviously using his blog for advertising purposes. As such, it would be counterproductive for him--or his bank account--to allow comments that are derogatory to him or his tattered reputation.