# A small duct tape mistake

Yes, I am going to talk about the MythBusters latest duct tape episode. A couple of pre-post points:

1. They call it "duct" tape. I call it duck tape. It doesn't work very well with ducts. Also, it is good for water proofing stuff - you know like a duck. For the rest of this post, I am calling it duck tape. (Wikipedia agrees there is some naming problem)
2. You know I love the MythBusters - right? I hope you don't think I sit around waiting for them to make a mistake so I can pounce on them (I save that for ESPN Sport Science). In this case, they just made a small mistake. A mistake that can be used to show something about physics.
3. Duck tape bridge = awesome

Ok, on to the small mistake. One of the things the MythBusters were testing with duck tape was the idea that you could tape a car to a light pole so it couldn't move. To do this, Tory and Grant used a force gauge to measure how much the car in question could pull. They got about 1300 lbs. Also, they knew from Jamie and Adam that one strand of duck tape would break around 67 lbs. So, how much tape do you need? They said 20 strands because 20 x 67 lbs = 1340 lbs. Ah HA! There is the problem. Really. Let me draw a diagram of the car looking down from above.

To first approximation, let me assume that the tape is pulling in the exact opposite direction the car is trying to drive. In that case, I can draw the following force diagram:

If the car is in equilibrium, then in the direction the car is trying to go the following is true:

So, if the frictional force on the car is 1300 pounds, then the total force each tape must exert would be 650 pounds. How many layers of tape would that need?

Not 20. But, to be honest, I don't really know how they were counting. Maybe they counted both sides to get to their 20 layers. Ok, now for something a little different. What if I consider that they are at an angle? Here is the force diagram with the tapes at an angle.

Now in the direction the car is trying to go, the following must be true:

Notice that I am call Ftape-1 the force 1 layer of tape can exert on the car and n is the number of layers. What if I want n to be 20. What would theta have to be?

Maybe this is what the MythBusters were doing (they were right about the colliding two objects - remember?)

Tags

### More like this

##### Parkour Physics: Wall Climb
Forgive me if I don't know the official parkour term for this move. This is where you have two walls that are close to each other and you vertically climb them. Here is a shot of Mark Witmer (from Ninja Warrior) doing the wall climb. Doesn't look too hard, does it? Well, I think it depends on…
##### I can pull more than 3000 POUNDS!
Note: This is part of my ongoing attack of ESPN's show Sport Science. Really, I am continuing to look at the episode where they calculate a football player can produce 57,000 Watts by pulling some stuff. Wait...I don't want to limit my stuff to Sport Science. I see this stuff all the time. The…
##### MythBusters pulling on a phone book: You are doing it wrong.
The MythBusters aren't really doing it wrong, but they give me a chance to talk about some physics. In the latest show, they tested the myth that two phone books with their pages alternating were indestructible. To test this, they put the two phone books together and then pulled them apart in a…
##### Friction Demo with a meterstick
This is one of my favorite demos. Easy to do and doesn't really require any equipment. The basic idea is that you support a meter stick horizontally with two fingers. Slide your fingers in and they will both meet at the center of mass. Here is a video. Meterstick friction demo from Rhett Allain…

(perhaps) little known fact: There's duct tape and there's duct tape (aka duck tape; aka gaff (as in gaffers tape). There are grades of gaff tape that are SERIOUSLY stronger than the usual commercial product.

My fav recent bit of Newtonian physics was the one about shooting a ball out the back of a moving pickup at exactly the same speed as the truck was moving, to see it drop straight down.

Granted, they were prototyping it using Newtonian methods, and it would have looked much simpler (oddly enough) by just using frame of reference maths, but there you go.

At least Newton was right (again). :)

By Joe Shelby (not verified) on 13 May 2010 #permalink

To be fair to the mythbusters, they called it about 7 different things. Then they settled on one common word. They also indicated what it was composed of.

@rpsms

I agree that they acknowledged the different names. However, the name of the episode (according to my DVR) says "duct tape".

If there were any rock/ice climbers among the MythBusters crew -- they'd have certainly done it that way.

Building your climbing anchors wrong, for exactly these reasons, can literally be a fatal mistake. American climbers had their ignorance of this little fact become prevalent enough that one anchor setup became know as the "American Death Triangle".

Good call! Keep it up and maybe you'll get a mythbusters water bottle too.