More Blog Carnival Pimping - Bio::Blogs

Imagine being both a science dork and computer nerd. We call those people bioinformaticians and beg them to debug our pitiful little programs for us. If we're lucky, one of them has already written a program that performs the exact data analysis that we need. That saves us feeble bad programmers much time and keeps our frustration at a minimum. Alas, they rarely write a program that does exactly what we need, so we often need to figure out how to manipulate their code to do what we want.

Some bioinformaticians have gotten together and started a blog carnival (who does that?) and named it Bio::Blogs (this is some sort of computer joke). The first edition is available at Public Rambling. They included a link to my post on the evolution of gene expression, along with a few other more bioinformatic posts. If you blog about bioinformatics or computational biology, consider submitting a post for next month's edition.

More like this

Welcome to the fourth edition of Bio::Blogs! This is the carnival where we explore topics at the intersection of computing, biology, and sometimes a bit human behavior. In this edition, we consider issues with annotation, agonize over standards, explore the question of whether or not it's…
or, better yet, enjoy the fine selection of summer carnivals. In no particular order, we have: Bio::Blogs#3 Hosted this month by mndoci (aka Depak Singh) at business|bytes|genes|molecules, Bio::Blogs is a carnival of articles at the intersection of biology and computation. If you are interested…
Bio::Blogs #3 has been posted at business|bytes|genes|molecules. Bio::Blogs is a blog carnival that deals with computational biology. Next month's edition will be hosted by Sandy. If you write something about computational biology this month, send a link to her.
I keep getting asked: why should I participate in blog carnivals? The Wikipedia page about blog carnivals is not really accurate (it includes things that are not carnivals), and also suffers from overzealous, obsessive-compulsive, self-important administrators (who have probably never seen a…

So we are dorks and nerds hum ? :) I am not sure I could call myself a programmer (biochemistry background) so maybe I can be just a dork. Thanks for the link.

Thanks for the mention. We're definitely geeks though, not nerds and certainly not dorks :) Geek is the new cool, you know.

We'll most likely be back in a couple of weeks to ask for posts for the next edition. It doesn't have to be hardcore programming material - genomics is certainly within our sphere of interest (see Nodalpoint for the types of things that people discuss). So don't be shy and submit those posts.

I don't see being labeled a dork or a nerd a bad thing. I refuse to call myself a geek, and I won't use the word to describe someone else (unless I'm looking to really insult them). Look into the etymology of "geek". It's not a happy story.