The Problem of Choice: Few Americans Seek Public Affairs News Online

i-61aba1187503eab61912d7e6f5113fef-Got_News_Yesterday.gif
By way of the Internet, Americans today have more public affairs and science-related information available to them than at any time in history. Yet the availability of information does not mean people will use it. Given the many competing alternatives across entertainment, celebrity culture, and other diversionary content, only those Internet users with a very strong preference for public affairs will use the medium for "hard" news on a regular base.

This general pattern of Internet consumption is once again reflected in the just released "Pew State of the News" survey. In the section focusing on "online news," as graphed above, though roughly 70% of Americans say that they have sought news online in the past, only roughly 30% of Americans are regular online news consumers, or "got news online yesterday." In the same survey, 3% of respondents reported reading a "news blog" yesterday.

More like this

I'm on record here as being very optimistic about the younger generation. Perhaps it's conceit. They remind me of us (sixties era and even before). Still, there is no shortage of older folks who are condemned to repeat history by bemonaing how the young 'uns have gone to the dogs. And the world is…
Actually, Journalists do take some of the blame for the death of newspapers: But why is the business model dying? Competition is a factor, and blogs are obviously part of that mix. But again, if I'd started a business and someone else opened up down the street and offered a more appealing product,…
As a blogger, I'm apparently in the minority in more ways than one (I speak here as one of the Reveres and for myself only). A telephone survey done by the Pew Internet and American Life project estimates that half of bloggers are below the age of 30 (not me, alas), are interested in blogging as a…
You know I have been following the "death of newspapers" debate, as well as "bloggers vs. journalists" debate, and "do we need science reporters" debate for a long time now. What I have found - and it is frustrating to watch - is that different people use different definitions for the same set of…

I think those numbers are extremely high! How many Americans "seek" news of any kind on a daily basis? That 30% of Americans seek news on a daily basis online to me means that most of the people that look for some news now do it online. Bad news for newspapers since that has to be the majority old source.

The survey also found that the number of people who get their news online stabilized in 2006 at about 92 million people, rather than continuing to rise. Why should this be? The report suggests that the conventional idea of going online -- meaning using a standard computer -- is outmoded, since many people are now getting news and other information on mobile devices. This may not bode well for in-depth, investigative journalism.

Perhaps stabilizing readership, rather than continuing to rise, reflects more news providers restricting access to subscribers and selling site licenses, so more people can't get their news for free. I think the in-depth news sites are moving to this model, rather than open access for all. That may mean investigative journalism survives in a niche.

By Josh Fischman (not verified) on 19 Mar 2007 #permalink