What?
Just watch:
- Log in to post comments
More like this
... they weren't scared, but the guy trying to rob them sure was.
...
Wally was sitting at his computer when the man entered his home.
"He just stood there in that doorway, standing there with a shovel," said Wally. "I thought, 'what the hell is going on here?' I thought it was a joke!"
After…
What will they say? How will Isis maintain her anonymity on a thing where you display your head??? Will PalMD be so gaga in the presence of the Goddess that he babbles inarticulately?
If these questions interest you, just watch:
Very nice discussion.
Or at least, I think he was trying to make a point, but I'm not entirely sure.
Joel Rosenberg, author of Everything You Need to Know About (Legally) Carrying a Handgun in Minnesota and proprietor of the web site "Jew with a gun," entered the Hennepin County Office Building to keep an appointment…
Hey, guess what? It turns out that if 90% of the people want something, and it is the only right thing to do, and not doing it not only "not the right thing" but it is also an abysmally horrid, insensitive, immoral, and boneheaded thing to do, that YOU LOSE.
Republican Senator Kelly Ayotte of New…
Should have been done ages ago!!!
This fight against this says two things.......
Companies HATE doing anything GOOD that will cut into their profits, and gun owners don't want to leave clues around about how they use their guns.
Might be worse than just not wanting to spend $6 per gun. Perhaps too much of their business is actually to criminals so they don't want to lose that entire market segment.
Wasn't there something a few years ago about tagging gunpowder in such a way that each batch made was identifiable after its use, and that technology was refused by the ammo makers?
I wonder what Smith & Wesson had to say. It is obvious to me that this requirement would change the mass production system into a pseudo piece by piece manufacture. Maybe the objection was not the $6 per gun (sounds awfully low as a cost of individualizing the manufacture and record management involved). And to give up a large market would not be good business unless something more than a few dollars per gun is involved. Might be that California is not that great a market for handguns after all. Anyone know where the company comments are to be found?
I don't know where the comments would be. But with the water shortage I would think california would be an expanding market for personal firearms.
Smarter, are you thinking of "Taggons" (sp?) suggested for fertilizer that might be made into bombs?