March for Science

The March for Science is scheduled to take place April 22, 2017 in DC . Hashtag #ScienceMarch

Twitter account here.

Web site here, though not much there yet, this was JUST announced seconds ago.

Please note that they are accepting donations. Click through to the donations page to give a donation!

Alternate logo here:

MarchForScience

To find out about other marches in your area, if you can't get to DC, for now, look at March for Science "follow" list, here. They will be putting info up at a later time, apparently.

More like this

I've been thinking a lot about how to support victims and their families in Japan since the earthquake and tsunami struck last Friday. Ben Parr at Mashable gives us some simple, concrete ways we can help in his article, "Japan Earthquake & Tsunami: 7 Simple Ways to Help." Please do what you…
You have proven your fitness, evolutionarily speaking, not when you have babies, but when your babies have babies. So I am very excited that my babies - the three science blogging conferences here in the Triangle so far - have spawned their own offspring. Not once, but twice. The London franchise…
Hey guys! Monty Harper is trying to raise funds to do ANOTHER 'Songs from the Science Frontier'! Not only does he have some great rewards for donations (for $15, you get the songs, totally reasonable), he has got a bunch of new donation bonuses up for Cyber Monday, like including your kids voice in…
Minnesota Congresswoman Michelle Bachmann blames the current mortgage crisis on African Americans. This is why she has won the most recent "Worst Person in the World Award" ... see video below. This is also why the Entire World has to get together and work to have this woman THROWN OUT OF OFFICE…

So will they insist that government programs be scientifically evaluated, like Head Start and affirmative action? How about insisting that people acknowledge differences between men and women in abilities and interests, which the anti-science folks at Harvard drove out Larry Summers for saying?

"Mike" here makes me sad that some abuse the ability to move and communicate.

A better place to start would be a study to detrimental just how deep miken's lack of knowledge is. It seems boundless.

Do you agree that Larry Summers was being unscientific in his statements and should have been thrown out as President of Harvard for suggesting that women may have different interests as men and this explains the disparity in science majors?

"Do you agree that Larry Summers was being unscientific in his statements"

Yes, there is no doubt of that

Study? Data? Analysis?

Or merely a reach into his own nether regions?

By Brainstorms (not verified) on 02 Feb 2017 #permalink

Larry Summers offered a possible explanation to be studied. He did not declare it as fact. This was unacceptable to the scientists present. The idea that women have different interests and emotions made Nancy Hopkins of MIT 'physically ill'.

No MikeN, it was presented as a done deal, contradicting the current state of research. Asserting something not established, as he did, simply because it seems reasonable, is not valid.

I can see why your ilk believes it though - you have shown yourself to have no regard for the things data actually says.

Because data gets in the way of The Holy Ideology. Ergo, it, and the accursed Science, must be smitten!

By Brainstorms (not verified) on 02 Feb 2017 #permalink

"So my best guess, to provoke you, of what's behind all of this is that the largest phenomenon, by far, is the general clash between people's legitimate family desires and employers' current desire for high power and high intensity, that in the special case of science and engineering, there are issues of intrinsic aptitude, and particularly of the variability of aptitude, and that those considerations are reinforced by what are in fact lesser factors involving socialization and continuing discrimination. I would like nothing better than to be proved wrong, because I would like nothing better than for these problems to be addressable simply by everybody understanding what they are, and working very hard to address them."

Is it fair for a scientist to lose his job for making a statement like this?

Dick has changed his socks because he's not going to get away with denying straight up maths, and has had to admit to error, so he's now reappeared as MikeN to continue the rightwing charge against reality and it's damn liberal bias.

Take a look at that chart. Do you find it strange that boys are outperforming girls in the Americas and Northern and Western Europe(or at least it's about even), while the Middle East shows girls doing better? I think it is in line with what I expected based on what Larry Summers said.

Again, why would boys be outperforming girls in these countries?

Even if the girls are performing better than the boys, what Summers said would still hold, where he spoke of(or alluded to, the transcript is not available) the variation being higher for boys.