I don't like that if you look at news reports over the past three hours or so, we find differing--but possibly escalating--reports of the casualties in Bangladesh. The highest estimate I've seen yet comes from Reuters Canada: "killed more than 500 people in Bangladesh and left thousands injured or missing." News is still rolling in, though. I don't think we really have any idea yet how bad it was.
Now is the time to think about humanitarian donations--the International Federation of Red Cross & Red Crescent Societies is a good start.
More like this
Bangladesh is a country with more than its share of woes. Now there is H5N1 galloping through its poultry. Bangladesh needs all the help it can get. Which also means it needs to help others, too. How can a resource poor country like Bangladesh help other nations?
That's what CNN is suggesting. This puts the catastrophe at tsunami scale. And it suggests that Nargis could rank among the top three or four most deadly cyclones of modern times.
My god.
Sidr is currently officially a Category 5 cyclone, and is about to make landfall in Bangladesh…and has also finally made the
Just one month ago, Cyclone Sidr - one of the fiercest cyclones to hit Bangladesh in the last 131 years - slammed the country's southern and southwestern regions.
One thing to remember is that even if the immediate death toll from the cyclone doesn't grow any higher, at a minimum hundreds of thousands of people are homeless, and countless farmers' livelihoods have been destroyed. The long-term impact will surely be devastating.
New York Yimes and others are reporting 600-1000 deaths and this will only go higher. rescuers are having a hard time getting to affected areas.
friends in Bangladesh report other big problems: lack of good, safe water to drink! waterborne diseases are the next wave of problems among others. the Bangladesh power grid keeps tripping and in Dhaka they haven't had any water or much power since the storm. the Daily Star newspaper is having problems updating owing to power problems. computers must have power and many people are relying on generators right now.
Chris -
My experience in covering natural disasters is that the first reports understate the damage, simply because they come from the places that still have communications infrastructure. In the LA earthquakes I covered back in my days there, I saw what I've described as the "donut" effect - initial reporting from the fringes of the most severely damaged area rather than the epicenter. Initial disaster reporting is always wrong, usually on the low side.