You've already read our policy forum in Science--but in my latest column for Science Progress, I go farther in drawing lessons from the ScienceDebate2008 experience thus far. They are:
1. Ignore the Naysayers
2. Whatever Happens in 2008, We Can Build on the Experience in 2012
3. There is No Excuse for Science To Run and Hide Again From Politics
4. Think Outside the Box, and Never Give Up
Read here for details....
P.S.: The massive and influential World Wildlife Federation has just endorsed ScienceDebate2008...
Categories
- Log in to post comments
More like this
So this is the first bit of news that we've been promising....
In the latest issue of Science, we--the ScienceDebate2008 crew--have a policy forum article that lays out how this all got started, its implications, and where it's going. Doing the article was Sheril's idea, and she did a great deal of…
I don't think I ever refused a meme, even if I have done it already, especially if a lot of time passed, or one can provide new answers every time. But this one is tough, as I would barely change anything from the last time I did it. But, since it is so old, I'll copy it here again and make a few…
For months, everyone has been asking us--on and off the blogosphere--when will there be an invitation for ScienceDebate 2008? Well, that day has come. See here for the press release (featuring Intel chairman Craig Barrett, who just joined the initiative), and here for the actual invite.
The latter…
Steven Levitt writes:
My view is that the emails [extracted by a hacker from the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia] aren't that damaging. Is it surprising that scientists would try to keep work that disagrees with their findings out of journals? When I told my father that I…
This is too important to give up, and I am very relieved that you have a plan for 2012. I liked your points 3 & 4 as well, as the oppositions have no qualms about mixing it up in public and seizing any political advantage they can. I hope many scientists will be mobilized to speak out and speak up in the public square. Squeaky wheels, and all that.
I am very happy to see that the World Wildlife Fund, one of my personal commitment organizations, has endorsed Sciencedebate 2008.
And I hardly ever give up... It will happen...
The trend is clear, indeed it is right on schedule. A cool, relentless equation. The "next" science debate will cover one topic. The one that isn't covered on this blog.
Well, unless there's a foolproof way to make sure the debate isn't run like tonight's debacle, a ScienceDebate could easily push science policy back out of the national discourse as quickly as it pushed it in.
I trust the organizers to find moderators who would ask questions about science policy (Hint, don't hire anyone from ABC News).
I don't trust the media to shape the coverage of a debate around the policy questions.
I don't trust the campaigns to shape their post-debate messages on the policy issues.
I would say the same things about debates focused on any particular area of policy.
I was one of those naysayers (on the grounds that there was just no way to make it happen this year) but #2 makes excellent sense.
"No Matter What Happens This Year, There is No Excuse for Science To Run and Hide Again From Politics."
Again this monolithic ans mystical "Science"! :-)
Why, then, should scientists "lay low" on matters _they_ personally think are politically important? Or why should they "check their highly developed critical faculties at the door" just because everyone does not think like them?
You see, also scientists have different kind of political views. It seems that the politicians (I count you as one) want scientists to speak out only when the former see it to be politically correct and when it is beneficial for the politicians cause.
Just read your latest in TNR. Excellent!