In my latest Science Progress column, I describe the utter meltdown at the Environmental Protection Agency, which involves not only mistreatment of agency scientists but the blatant failure to follow the law. Things probably haven't been this bad at the agency since the days of Ann Gorsuch Burford, if anyone remembers her. And that's saying something.
You can read the piece here.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Neil Gorsuch is a significant and meaningful choice for SCOTUS. The image above is not fake, it really is his Harvard Law yearbook photo. If he was a Democratic pick, that one image would end him. Since he is a Republican pick, democrats have a Big Tent instead of a spine, and Republicans have…
I haven't always had as much concern about copyright infringement as I do now, but I've always considered it to be a given that copyright infringement involves taking something that doesn't belong to you without paying the owner. Taking something that doesn't belong to you without paying the owner…
Environmental Science/Studies in Review, Volume 1
Here is a rundown of some recent pieces of note w/r/t environment, science, and technology -- specifically, a few on atrazine and hermaphroditic friogs, and then a few on Big Organic (farming and planting and eating and such).
From the August issue…
A certain truly badly done story is making its way through the skeptical blogosphere. It's a story that NPR did about a certain teenager who has decided that she doesn't believe the science behind global warming and has published a website to "debunk" it. What's bad about the story is not that a…
http://www.9news.com/rss/article.aspx?storyid=90862
Chris, I thought you might be interested in this story that aired on Channel 9 here in Denver last night. It's about Dr. William Gray at CSU.
Chris,
another type of abuse, not only at EPA but across many of these agencies, is that of scientific authority. Administrators, which themselves have little or no scientific experience, are the ones who either make the "scientific call' or decide who does. Thus, the level of scientific information needed in order to make a decision is constantly being increased. Many a good scientists have left EPA, F&WS, NASA, etc. and aren't replaced, or a much junior scientist replaces them.
Would be interesting to see the number of peer reviewed pubs coming out of these agencies during the last decade.
While I think Gerardo has a point, Administrator Johnson has the scientific experience (and the civil service experience) where you'd think he'd act differently than he has. What are particular events in his biography that could explain the apparent contradiction?