Does History of Science Blogging Have a Future?

This is a post simply to ask for comment on my last three (here, here, here) as a kind of genre exercise. Each post has been about my new foray into studying the history of science here at Princeton and testing out what it's like to be a student again. (The most insane kind of culture shock, is the short answer.)

Anyway, this is a very different kind of thing for the Intersection, although certainly not outside of its mandate. And so far, I like the response it has generally prompted. But I don't have to blog about the history of science for the next three to four's just a possibility right now--an experiment. Should it continue?

More like this

OK, this is the kind of thing that just pisses me off: the tendency for some liberals to go off all loopy and credulous. The perfect example is on Salon right now—an article that goes on at ridiculous length about the judgments of a physiognomist, a ditz who derives McCain's economic policy from… cool is this? I'm 31 years old. I graduated from college in 1999. Since then I've been a journalist--for ten years. But now, at this very minute, I'm finishing my first reading assignment for Princeton's History 293, "Science in a Global Context," taught by D. Graham Burnett. Today is the…
Geoff Andersen is a USAF Academy physicist and he has written a book on the Telescope The Telescope by Geoff Andersen Princeton University Press 2007 ISBN-13: 978-0-691-12979-2 It is an interesting little book, as promised it only has one equation, and it is a useful one, with the rest of the…
We've been watching Cyclone Nargis for a week here at the Intersection, but I've finally done my first lengthy piece about the disaster over at Science Progress. Over there, I make the following points, most of which I don't think you're seeing elsewhere: 1. It's Not About Global Warming, But…

Yes, yes, yes!!!!!

We had an entire session about it at ScienceOnline'09. and yes, it is needed.

And send all your posts to the Giant's Shoulders carnival as well.

Of course you should. In fact ignorance of the history of science is one of the most important ingredient missing in most science classes. It takes away the human element, the social context and the logical progression and reduces science to a set of facts. So do go ahead. I have a blog on the History of Physics

I'm definitely in favor of it, as long as it doesn't become the sole subject of the blog, which Sheril will prevent from happening anyway.

Besides, history allows for a much more objective examination of the intersection of science with culture, which is what this whole blog is about, am I right?

By Harry Abernathy (not verified) on 11 Feb 2009 #permalink

Good stuff. One of my favorite subjects.

By Jon Winsor (not verified) on 11 Feb 2009 #permalink

I wholeheartedly agree with the above sentiments. Please do continue to post history science entries.

Love the history-was thinking about the Francis Bacon stuff all the next day after I read it.

Blogging on history of science would be great. Keep 'em coming! :D

Well then that does it. I will keep doing what I'm doing. thanks everyone!

I stumbled onto the blog and added it to my RSS feed after reading the Sir F. Bacon pieces. Provocative stuff - I'm blown away by his vision in the 1600's.