This is a post simply to ask for comment on my last three (here, here, here) as a kind of genre exercise. Each post has been about my new foray into studying the history of science here at Princeton and testing out what it's like to be a student again. (The most insane kind of culture shock, is the short answer.)
Anyway, this is a very different kind of thing for the Intersection, although certainly not outside of its mandate. And so far, I like the response it has generally prompted. But I don't have to blog about the history of science for the next three to four months...it's just a possibility right now--an experiment. Should it continue?
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Yesterday's write-up of my Science paper ended with a vague promise to deal some inside information about the experiment. So, here are some anecdotes that you would need to have been at Yale in 1999-2000 to pick up. We'll stick with the Q&A format for this, because why not?
Why don't we start…
"But I'm also talking about American businessmen doing what they were born to do. Make things. We've stopped making and become a country of consumers. Well, I, for one, am done consuming. And I'm ready to make." -Jack Donaghy, 30 Rock
I don't normally write about what's going on in my personal life…
Two years ago, we linked to a post about an ABC news program that claimed to have replicated Stanley Milgram's controversial experiments from the 1960s and 70s about obedience to authority. The original study tricked unwitting paid study participants into believing that they had administered…
Here we go again. Ross Olson is sending more patronizing email, so I guess I'll have to be mean and tear up his prior argument.
November 18, 2009
Dr. Myers,
Thank you for posting my comments and promising to comment on the questions
I raised. Here is the introduction I gave to your debate with Dr…
Yes, yes, yes!!!!!
We had an entire session about it at ScienceOnline'09. and yes, it is needed.
And send all your posts to the Giant's Shoulders carnival as well.
Of course you should. In fact ignorance of the history of science is one of the most important ingredient missing in most science classes. It takes away the human element, the social context and the logical progression and reduces science to a set of facts. So do go ahead. I have a blog on the History of Physics
I'm definitely in favor of it, as long as it doesn't become the sole subject of the blog, which Sheril will prevent from happening anyway.
Besides, history allows for a much more objective examination of the intersection of science with culture, which is what this whole blog is about, am I right?
Good stuff. One of my favorite subjects.
I wholeheartedly agree with the above sentiments. Please do continue to post history science entries.
Some of your SciBlings engaged on this topic a few months ago (July-August). You can start with this post to get your feet wet.
http://scienceblogs.com/strangerfruit/2008/08/the_big_list_of_history_o…
Ben at The World's Fair works a lot in that field as well. Take a gander at them all.
Well I learned something about Francis Bacon and I think you should blog about whatever you're interested in & want to.
Love the history-was thinking about the Francis Bacon stuff all the next day after I read it.
Blogging on history of science would be great. Keep 'em coming! :D
Well then that does it. I will keep doing what I'm doing. thanks everyone!
I stumbled onto the blog and added it to my RSS feed after reading the Sir F. Bacon pieces. Provocative stuff - I'm blown away by his vision in the 1600's.
Those Bacon posts were great, Chris! I had no idea about any of that. Please do keep up! And submit to Giant's Shoulders!