What do flies, fish, mice and worms have to do with biomedical science?

 

Image of common model organisms from European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL). Image of common model organisms from European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL).

A recent article posted in the BBC News provided a good explanation of why scientists commonly study these organisms as models for human diseases and conditions. Model organisms are chosen because their physiology is similar to other animals, including humans, in addition to other reasons:

Visit the BBC News to see why researchers most often use flies, fish, mice and worms to understand the mechanisms of disease and health.

Did you know that ~70% of the genes in a fruit fly are homologous to human genes?  Zebrafish have genes that are homologous to those involved in ~75% of genetic-related human diseases. 

Top Image: EMBL, Explore Model Organisms

More like this

From my inbox: First Interdisciplinary NeuroSchool of the European Neuroscience and Society Network, EMBL, Monterotondo (Rome) Sept. 28th-Oct. 5th We are pleased to invite applications to the first interdisciplinary 'NeuroSchool' of the European Neuroscience and Society Network, a five year…
So, let's see what's new in PLoS Genetics, PLoS Computational Biology and PLoS Pathogens this week. As always, you should rate the articles, post notes and comments and send trackbacks when you blog about the papers. Here are my own picks for the week - you go and look for your own favourites:…
I was busy, so I did not have time to take a look until now at what is new this week in PLoS Genetics, Computational Biology, Pathogens and Neglected Tropical Diseases. Go take a look at these papers and others: Evolution of Evolvability in Gene Regulatory Networks: A cell receives signals both…
Ancestral reconstruction of segmental duplications reveals punctuated cores of human genome evolution: Human segmental duplications are hotspots for nonallelic homologous recombination leading to genomic disorders, copy-number polymorphisms and gene and transcript innovations. The complex structure…

I would suggest that everyone objectively read the writings of Dr Spetner and Dr Alvin Radgowsky..both highly respected scientists....not kooky creationists by any means... Look at the probability calculated that an aeomeba formed itself by chance....humans have 92 chromsomes yet worms have over 100? They only use scientific data and mathematics to clearly show how improbable this

By james ainoris (not verified) on 18 Jun 2013 #permalink

@James #1 -- This is off topic from the post. Anyone except a kooky creationist would understand that any such "probability calculated" is utter and complete nonsense. Please feel free to peruse any number of past postings in Lifelines, EvolutionBlog, or elsewhere on this site to learn why.

By Michael Kelsey (not verified) on 18 Jun 2013 #permalink

When studying a gene that is new for me, I immediately want to know if a homolog exists in mouse, bird, fish, fly, worm, yeast, and how similar it is. If it's conserved down to yeast, we know it's pretty ancient. Yeah, we believe in common decent, partly cause it gives us ideas that have proven useful in the past and we figure it'll help again on today's gene. We're so crazy we want to know what other proteins interact with this protein in yeast. It's almost never useless information.

Many years ago I had a serious head injury, I have found over the years that the brain can heal itself, however slowly, even years afterwards. Though not completely so, it is much, much better now than at the time of injury and even several years after.

By Tony Rotz (not verified) on 26 Jun 2013 #permalink

Fish, mice, flies and moles have the same physiological mechanism as humans and this the reason that most of the experiments are performed on them.

By B&B Brugge (not verified) on 06 Jul 2013 #permalink