All Your Creationist Embryos Are Belonging to Us!

By way of ScienceBlogling John Lynch, I read that George Gilder calls biologists "Darwinian stormtroopers." In the same NY Times article, John West claims (italics mine):

The [Darwinian] technocrats, he charged, wanted to grab control from "ordinary citizens and their elected representatives" so that they alone could make decisions over "controversial issues such as sex education, partial-birth abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research and global warming."

While Gilder and West don't realize it, they have stumbled across our Evil Darwinist Plot:

imperialstormtroopers

That's why we want the embryonic stem cells: to clone our army of Darwinian Stormtroopers!

Who says Hofstadter's paranoid style is dead?

While we're discussing that Times article, what burned me up was this (italics mine):

Some of these thinkers have gone one step further, arguing that Darwin's scientific theories about the evolution of species can be applied to today's patterns of human behavior, and that natural selection can provide support for many bedrock conservative ideas, like traditional social roles for men and women, free-market capitalism and governmental checks and balances.

"I do indeed believe conservatives need Charles Darwin," said Larry Arnhart, a professor of political science at Northern Illinois University in DeKalb, who has spearheaded the cause. "The intellectual vitality of conservatism in the 21st century will depend on the success of conservatives in appealing to advances in the biology of human nature as confirming conservative thought."

These 'thinkers' aren't going "one step further", but one step backwards. What they're describing is called Social Darwinism... which supposedly was the reason William Jennings Bryan got all het up about evolution in the first place.

Morons.

More like this

I'm sure PZ will comment on this, but I couldn't help but highlight this statement by George Gilder: The notion that "the whole universe contains no intelligence," Mr. Gilder said at Thursday's conference, is perpetuated by "Darwinian storm troopers." "Both Nazism and communism were inspired by…
Last Thursday the American Enterprise Institute sponsored a debate on the subject of Darwinism and Conservatism. A video of the debate is available online, but I haven't had a chance to view it yet. In the meantime, I'll have to make do with this article from The New York Times. Over the years…
Every so often, a creationist will start babbling about "information theory", and thereby defaming a perfectly legitimate line of research. While I'm at the airport, waiting for my flight back from ASM2011, here's something from the archives, "Creationists, "Biological Information", and Cyber-…
In response to us foul-mouthed evolutionists, Casey Luskin asks, "Yet for all their numbers and name-calling, not a single one has answered Egnor's question: How does [sic] Darwinian mechanisms produce new biological information?" I've never liked the whole "biological information" concept. As far…

Haha! That is amazing.

By Adrian Clement (not verified) on 07 May 2007 #permalink

"The [Darwinian] technocrats, he charged, wanted to grab control from 'ordinary citizens and their elected representatives' so that they alone could make decisions over 'controversial issues such as sex education, partial-birth abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research and global warming.'"

As opposed to the religious righties who sued to overturn Oregon's assisted suicide law (passed by popular referendum) and who want to overturn all state-level decision making on civil unions and (in many cases) abortion by passing federal amendments banning the practice?

Not to mention that righties are in much the same position on many economic issues, i.e., "technocrats" who want to take control from "ordinary citizens and their elected representatives" who want things like single-payer healthcare.

Really, this "elites want to kill you" schtick is tired. Find something new, you assholes.